刚性壁面附近双气泡动力学行为及相互作用规律

刘玥; 马天宝; 谢晶

doi:10.12382/bgxb.2025.0640

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

刚性壁面附近双气泡动力学行为及相互作用规律

更新时间：2026-02-16

- 刚性壁面附近双气泡动力学行为及相互作用规律
- Dynamic Behavior and Interaction Mechanisms of Double-Bubbles Near a Rigid Wall
- 兵工学报 2026年
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目(12272052)
- DOI：10.12382/bgxb.2025.0640
  中图分类号： 0383.1
- 收稿：2025-07-11，
  
  网络首发：2026-02-13，
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
刘玥，马天宝，谢晶. 刚性壁面附近双气泡动力学行为及相互作用规律[J/OL]. 兵工学报, 2026(2026-02-16). https://doi.org/10.12382/bgxb.2025.0640.

LIU Y, MA T B, XIE J. Dynamic behavior and interaction mechanisms of double-bubbles near a rigid wall[J/OL]. Acta Armamentarii, 2026(2026-02-16). https://doi.org/10.12382/bgxb.2025.0640. (in Chinese)
刘玥，马天宝，谢晶. 刚性壁面附近双气泡动力学行为及相互作用规律[J/OL]. 兵工学报, 2026(2026-02-16). https://doi.org/10.12382/bgxb.2025.0640. DOI：

LIU Y, MA T B, XIE J. Dynamic behavior and interaction mechanisms of double-bubbles near a rigid wall[J/OL]. Acta Armamentarii, 2026(2026-02-16). https://doi.org/10.12382/bgxb.2025.0640. (in Chinese) DOI：

摘要

在实际水下爆炸环境中，边界条件的多样性对气泡动力学行为有显著影响，尤其是靠近刚性壁面的气泡，其坍塌过程会因壁面效应加剧，形成高速射流，对周围结构造成更强冲击。采用欧拉–拉格朗日耦合（Coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian

CEL）算法，对水下爆炸中刚性壁面附近双气泡系统在平行壁面与垂直壁面构型下的演化特性进行了数值模拟研究，并通过与单气泡实验数据对比验证了模型的有效性。结果表明，无量纲气泡壁面间隙参数

和双气泡间距参数

对气泡形态及射流行为具有关键影响。当

较小时，气泡更易被壁面吸附并在其上收缩坍塌，而

>0.5时气泡不再贴附壁面；

越小，气泡越易融合并产生强射流，融合临界值约为

=0.6。进一步分析显示，平行壁面构型下

=0.4时气泡融合后射流速度显著提升，增幅达30%~50%；而在垂直壁面构型中，

1时气泡间距越大射流速度越高。本文的研究结论有助于加强对气泡行为的预测，从而更好地评估潜在的结构损伤风险，对于设计防护措施以减轻水下爆炸对结构的潜在损害具有重要意义。

Abstract

In real underwater explosion environments

the diversity of boundary conditions significantly influences bubble dynamics. In particular

bubbles near rigid walls experience intensified collapse due to wall effects

leading to the formation of high-speed jets that impose stronger impacts on surrounding structures.This study employs the Coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian (CEL)algorithmto simulate the evolution of a double-bubble system near rigid walls in underwater explosions

considering both parallel and perpendicular configurations. The validity of the model was verified by comparison with experimental data from

single-bubble cases.The results show that the dimensionless bubble-wall gap parameter

and the inter-bubble spacing parameter

play critical roles in bubble morphology and jet behavior. When α is small

bubbles tend to adhere to the wall and collapse against it; when

> 0.5

bubbles no longer attach to the wall. As

decreases

bubbles are more likely to merge and generate strong jets

with a critical merging threshold at approximately

= 0.6. Further analysis reveals that under the parallel wall configuration

when

= 0.4

jet velocity significantly increases after bubble merging

with an enhancement of 30%–50%. In contrast

in the perpendicular wall configuration

for

larger inter-bubble distances lead to higher jet velocities.The findings of this study contribute to a better understanding and prediction of bubble behavior

thereby improving the assessment of potential structural damage risks. This has important implications for the design of protective measures to mitigate the destructive effects of underwater explosions on structures.

关键词

Keywords

references

ZHANG A M , LI S M , CUI P , et al. A unified theory for bubble dynamics[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(3):033323.

LI M K, ZHANG A M, MING Y X. A coupled smoothed particle hydrodynamics-finite volume method for three-dimensional modeling of bubble dynamics[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2023, 35(5):056117 .

KEDRINSKII V K. The role of cavitation effects in the mechanisms of destruction and explosive processes[J]. Shock Waves, 1997, 7(2): 63-76.

郑监，张舵，蒋邦海，等. 气泡与自由液面相互作用形成水射流的机理研究[J]. 物理学报，2017，66(4): 173-182.

ZHENG J, ZHANG D, JIANG B H, et al. Mechanism study of water jet formed by bubble-free surface interaction [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(4): 173-182. (in Chinese)

NI B Y, ZHANG A M. Numerical simulation of motion and deformation of ring bubble along body surface[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2013, 34(12): 1495-1512.

牟金磊, 朱石坚, 刁爱民, 等. 边界条件对水下爆炸气泡运动特性的影响分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2014, 33(13): 92-97.

MOU J L, ZHU S J, DIAO A M, et al. Influence of boundary conditions on dynamic characteristics of underwater explosion bubbles[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(13): 92-97. (in Chinese)

姚熊亮, 刘文韬, 张阿漫, 等. 水下爆炸气泡及其对结构毁伤研究综述[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2016, 11(1): 36-45.

YAO X L, LIU W T, ZHANG A M, et al. Review of the research on underwater explosion bubbles and the corresponding structural damage[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2016, 11(1): 36-45. (in Chinese)

王海坤, 刘建湖, 毛海斌, 等. 水下爆炸气泡及其射流的光电联合测量研究[J]. 防护工程, 2015, 37(4): 36-42.

WANG H K, LIU J H, MAO H B, et al. Photoelectric joint measurement of underwater explosion bubbles and their jet characteristics[J]. Protective Engineering, 2015, 37(4): 36-42. (in Chinese)

盛振新, 刘建湖, 张显丕, 等. 水下爆炸气泡射流载荷阵列测量技术探索[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2021, 41(3): 55-62.

SHENG Z X, LIU J H, ZHANG X P, et al. Exploration of array measurement technology for underwater explosion bubble jet loading[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2021, 41(3): 55-62. (in Chinese)

GIBSON D C. Cavitation bubbles near boundaries [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1987, 19(1): 99-123.

孙远翔, 刘新, 陈岩武, 等. 水下爆炸气泡射流载荷及对结构毁伤研究进展[J].舰船科学技术, 2024, 46(1): 1-7.

SUN Y X, LIU X, CHEN Y W, et al. Research progress of underwater explosion bubble jet and its damage to structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2024, 46(1): 1-7. (in Chinese)

FABIAN R, QINGYUN Z, CLAUS-DIETER O. The Rayleigh prolongation factor at small bubble to wall stand-off distances[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2022,944: A11 .

SU B, YAO X L, CUI X W. Experimental research of underwater explosion bubble dynamics between two parallel plates with various distances[J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2022, 122: 103081.

WANG A, ZHONG Y X, WANG G H, et al. Experimental study on the formation of two axial jets of cavitation bubbles near soft membranes with different thicknesses[J]. AIP Advances, 2022, 12(9): 095023.

MATOS H, GALUSKA M, JAVIER C, et al. A review of underwater shock and fluid–structure interactions[J]. Flow, 2024, 4: E10.

MA W T, ZHAO X N, GILBERT C, et al. Computational analysis of bubble–structure interactions in near-field underwater explosion[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2022, 242: 111527.

ZHANG A M, YAO X L, FENG L H. The dynamic behavior of a gas bubble near a wall[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2009, 36(3-4): 295-305.

李健, 林贤坤, 荣吉利, 等. 近壁面水下爆炸气泡运动的数值计算研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2014, 33(15):200-205.

LI J, LIN X K, RONG J L, et al. Numerical study on bubble dynamics in near-wall underwater explosion[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(15):200-205. (in Chinese)

张昌锁，薛剑，王成. 带孔刚性壁对水下爆炸气泡特性影响研究[J]. 北京理工大学学报，2018，38(8)：771-778.

ZHANG C S, XUE J, WANG C. Influence of perforated rigid wall on characteristics of underwater explosion bubble[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2018, 38(8): 771-778. (in Chinese)

李旭, 岳松林, 邱艳宇, 等. 近场水下爆炸气泡与混凝土组合板相互作用的试验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(S1): 79-89.

LI X, YUE S L, QIU Y Y, et al. Experimental study on interaction between bubble and concrete composite slab in near-field underwater explosion[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(S1): 79-89. (in Chinese)

KIYAMA A, SHIMAZAKI T, GORDILLO J M, et al. Direction of the microjet produced by the collapse of a cavitation bubble located in a corner of a wall and a free surface[J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2021, 6(8): 083601.

KLASEBOER E, KHOO B C, HUNG K C. Dynamics of an oscillating bubble near a floating structure[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2005, 21(4): 395-412.

TOMITA Y, ROBINSON P B, TONG R P, et al. Growth and collapse of cavitation bubbles near a curved rigid boundary[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2002, 466: 259-283.

ZHANG A M, LI S M, CUI P, et al. Interactions between a central bubble and a surrounding bubble cluster [J]. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 2023, 13(3):100438 .

RUNGSAIYAPHORNRAT S, KLASEBOER E, KHOO B C, et al. The merging of two gaseous bubbles with an application to underwater explosions[J]. Computers & Fluids, 2003, 32(8): 1049-1074.

李章锐, 宗智, 董婧, 等. 两个气泡相互作用的某些动力特性研究[J]. 船舶力学, 2012, 16(7): 717-729.

LI Z R, ZONG Z, DONG J, et al. Study on some dynamic characteristics of two interacting bubbles[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2012, 16(7):717-729. (in Chinese)

张阿漫, 曾令玉, 王诗平, 等. 水下爆炸气泡融合动态特性研究[J]. 应用数学和力学, 2010, 31(2): 163-170.

ZHANG A M, ZENG L Y, WANG S P, et al. Dynamic characteristics of underwater explosion bubble fusion [J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2010, 31(2): 163-170. (in Chinese)

李健, 荣吉利, 林贤坤, 等. 水下爆炸两气泡相互作用的数值计算研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(4):468-474 .

LI J, RONG J L, LIN X K, et al. Numerical study of interaction of two bubbles in underwater explosion[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(4) :468-474. (in Chinese)

XUE Z Q, LI S P, XIN C L, et al. Modeling of the whole process of shock wave overpressure of free-field air explosion[J]. Defence Technology, 2019, 15(5): 815-820.

荣吉利, 何轩, 项大林, 等. 定向战斗部水下爆炸相似性研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(9): 1329-1334.

RONG J L, HE X, XIANG D L, et al. Similarity study on underwater explosion of directional warhead[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(9): 1329-1334. (in Chinese)

张之凡, 谢宇杰, 王成, 等. 近自由面水下爆炸气泡与破损结构耦合作用机理研究[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2022, 42(9): 909-917.

ZHANG Z F, XIE Y J, WANG C, et al. Coupling mechanism between underwater explosion bubble and damaged structure near free surface[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2022, 42(9): 909-917. (in Chinese)

CUI P, ZHANG A M, WANG S P. Small-charge underwater explosion bubble experiments under various boundary conditions[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2016, 28(11): 117103.

COLE R H. Underwater Explosions[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1948: 227-308.

PLESSET M S, PROSPERETTI A. Bubble dynamics and cavitation[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1977, 9(1): 145-185.

ZHANG A M, YAO X L, FENG L H. The dynamic behavior of a gas bubble near a wall[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2009, 36(3-4): 295-305.

浏览量

下载量

CNKI被引量

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

近场水下爆炸荷载作用下桥墩动力响应分析

近场水下爆炸气泡与混凝土组合板相互作用的试验研究

水下爆炸冲击波和气泡载荷对典型圆柱壳结构的毁伤特性

水下爆炸两气泡相互作用的数值计算研究

水下爆炸冲击下不同姿态舰员响应特性