中兵智能创新研究院有限公司,北京 100072
群体协同与自主实验室,北京 100072
北京理工大学 机械与车辆学院,北京 100081
*通信作者邮箱:lvyanzhi_123@163.com
收稿:2025-04-08,
网络首发:2026-02-11,
纸质出版:2026-01-31
移动端阅览
吕彦直, 林如宁, 林本祥, 等. 考虑场景时空特征的多目标最优类人驾驶轨迹规划[J]. 兵工学报, 2026,47(1):250259.
LÜ Yanzhi, LIN Runing, LIN Benxiang, et al. Multi-objective Optimal Human-like Driving Trajectory Planning Considering Scenarios Spatiotemporal Characteristics[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2026, 47(1): 250259.
吕彦直, 林如宁, 林本祥, 等. 考虑场景时空特征的多目标最优类人驾驶轨迹规划[J]. 兵工学报, 2026,47(1):250259. DOI: 10.12382/bgxb.2025.0259.
LÜ Yanzhi, LIN Runing, LIN Benxiang, et al. Multi-objective Optimal Human-like Driving Trajectory Planning Considering Scenarios Spatiotemporal Characteristics[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2026, 47(1): 250259. DOI: 10.12382/bgxb.2025.0259.
为充分利用驾驶场景时空特征、使轨迹规划满足多种驾驶需求、得到安全稳定的类人驾驶规划轨迹,构建考虑场景时空特征的多目标最优类人驾驶轨迹规划模型。基于图论的方法,研究动态驾驶场景全局时空交互特征融合方法,根据模仿学习的理论,构建考虑时空特征和他车预测轨迹影响的类人驾驶轨迹规划网络模型,针对网络输出的多个候选规划轨迹,利用多目标优选的思想对其进行综合评价并择优,进而得到动态场景下的多目标最优类人驾驶规划轨迹,通过设计轨迹规划仿真实验,对提出的轨迹规划方法进行测试验证。实验结果表明,规划模型可高效处理驾驶场景时空交互特征,对其他交通参与者不同的驾驶行为做出准确判断和实时反应,输出多目标最优类人驾驶规划轨迹。
In order to make full use of spatiotemporal characteristics of driving scenarios
make trajectory planning meet various driving needs
and obtain safe and stable human-like driving trajectories
a multi-objective optimal human-like driving trajectory planning model considering the spatiotemporal characteristics of scenarios is constructed. Based on the graph theory method
the global spatiotemporal interaction feature fusion method of dynamic driving scenarios is studied. According to the theory of imitation learning
a human-like driving trajectory planning network model considering the spatiotemporal characteristics and the influence of other vehicles' predicted trajectories is constructed. For those multiple candidate planning trajectories output by the network
the idea of multi-objective optimization is used to comprehensively evaluate and select them
and then the multi-objective optimal human-like driving trajectory in dynamic scenarios is obtained. The proposed trajectory planning method is tested and verified by simulation experiments. The experimental results show that the planning model can efficiently handle the spatiotemporal interaction characteristics of driving scenarios
make accurate judgments and real-time responses to different driving behaviors of other traffic participants
and output multi-objective optimal human-like driving planning trajectories.
SHARMA O, SAHOO N C, PUHAN N B. Recent advances in motion and behavior planning techniques for software architecture of autonomous vehicles:a state-of-the-art survey[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,2021,101:104211.
LIN X K, LIN J N, SU Z Y, et al. Research on key technologies of power internet of things based on artificial intelligence technology [C]∥ Proceedings of IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Bristol, England: IOP Publishing, 2021, 714(4):042067.
ZHAO Z G, CHENG S, DING Y, et al. A survey of optimization-based task and motion planning: from classical to learning approaches: arXiv: 2024. 02817 [R]. Ithaca, NY, US: Cornell University,2020:2024. 02817.
BETZ J, ZHENG H R, LINIGER A, et al. Autonomous vehicles on the edge:a survey on autonomous vehicle racing[J]. IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems,2022,3:458-488.
XU B, WANG G, YANG Z Y, et al. Multi-vehicle collaborative trajectory planning in unstructured conflict areas based on v-hybrid A * [J ] . IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2024,25(9):12722-12735.
ZHOU X, WANG X W, XIE Z H, et al. A collision-free path planning approach based on rule guided lazy-PRM with repulsion field for gantry welding robots [J]. Robotics and Autonomous Systems,2024,174:04633.
LIU B X, LIU C. Path planning of mobile robots based onimproved RRT algorithm[J]. Journal of Physics:Conference Series,2022, 2216:012020.
PAPARUSSO L, KASHIRI N, TSAGARAKIS N G. A disturbance-aware trajectory planning scheme based on model predictive control [J]. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters,2020,5(4):5779-5786.
LI Y, ZHU Q D. Local path planning based on improved dynamic window approach[C]∥Proceedings of 2021 40th Chinese Control Conference. Shanghai, China:IEEE,2021:4291-4295.
HUANG Y J, DING H T, ZHANG Y B, et al. A motion planning and tracking framework for autonomous vehicles based on artificial potential field elaborated resistance network approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics,2019,67(2):1376-1386.
ZHAO C Y, CHU D F, DENG Z J, et al. Human-like decision making for autonomous driving with social skills [J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems,2024,25(9):12269-12284.
LE MERO L, YI D W, DIANATI M, et al. A survey on imitation learning techniques for end-to-end autonomous vehicles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems,2022,23(9):14128-14147.
POMERLEAU D A. Alvinn: an autonomous land vehicle in a neural network[J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,1988,1:305-313.
TENG S Y, CHEN L, AI Y F, et al. Hierarchical interpretable imitation learning for end-to-end autonomous driving[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles,2022,8(1):673-683.
ULLAH Y, ROSLEE M, MITANI S M, et al. Reinforcement learning-based unmanned aerial vehicle trajectory planning for ground users' mobility management in heterogeneous networks [J]. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences,2024,36(5):102052.
IBRAHIM H A, AZAR A T, IBRAHIM Z F, et al. A hybrid deep learning based autonomous vehicle navigation and obstacles avoidance[C]∥Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision. Berlin, Germany:Springer,2020:296-307.
SHU H, LIU T, MU X Y, et al. Driving tasks transfer using deep reinforcement learning for decision-making of autonomous vehicles in unsignalized intersection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology,2021,71(1):41-52.
CHEN Z L, YE M S, XU S J, et al. Ppad:iterative interactions of prediction and planning for end-to-end autonomous driving:arXiv:2311. 08100 [R]. Ithaca, NY, US: Cornell University, 2023:2311. 08100.
CHEN S Y, JIANG B, GAO H, et al. Vadv2: end-to-end vectorized autonomous driving via probabilistic planning:arXiv:2402. 13243 [R]. Ithaca, NY, US: Cornell University, 2024:2402. 13243.
LIU D R, REN C N. Research on automatic driving system based on end-to-end and real-time path planning[C]∥Proceedings of 2025 IEEE 5th International Conference on Power, Electronics and Computer Applications. Shenyang, China:IEEE,2025:326-331.
HOU C M, ZHANG W. End-to-end urban autonomous driving with safety constraints[J]. IEEE Access,2024,12:132198-132209.
CHEN Y Y, JI C, CAI Y R, et al. Deep reinforcement learning in autonomous car path planning and control: a survey: arXiv:2404. 00340 [R]. Ithaca, NY, US: Cornell University, 2024:2404. 00340.
LIANG M, YANG B, HU R, et al. Learning lane graph representations for motion forecasting: arXiv:2007. 13732 [R]. Ithaca, NY, US:Cornell University,2020:2007. 13732.
GLOROT X, BORDES A, BENGIO Y. Deep sparse rectifier neural networks [C]∥Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. Fort Lauderdale, FL, US:JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 2011:315-323.
YU B, YIN H T, ZHU Z X. Spatio-temporal graph convolutional networks:a deep learning framework for traffic forecasting:arXiv:1709. 04875[R]. Ithaca, NY, US: Cornell University, 2017:1709. 04875.
BAI S J, KOLTER J Z, KOLTUN V. An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling: arXiv: 1803. 01271 [R]. Ithaca, NY, US: Cornell University,2018:1803. 01271.
DOSOVITSKIY A, ROS G, CODEVILLA F, et al. CARLA: an open urban driving simulator: arXiv: 1711. 03938 [R]. Ithaca, NY, US:Cornell University,2017:1711. 03938.
KINGMA D P, BA J. Adam:a method for stochastic optimization:arXiv: 1412. 6980 [R]. Ithaca, NY, US: Cornell University, 2014:1412. 6980.
0
浏览量
14
下载量
0
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024360号