
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 中山大学智能工程学院,广东,深圳,518107
2. 南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室,广东,珠海,519082
3. 中山大学人工智能研究院群体智能研究中心,广东,广州,510275
Received:29 October 2025,
Online First:15 April 2026,
移动端阅览
薛羽阳,王涛. 非透明场景下基于指标关联特征的地面目标群价值评估方法[J/OL]. 兵工学报, 2026(2026-04-15). https://doi.org/10.12382/bgxb.2025.0966.
XUE Y Y, WANG T. A target group value assessment method driven by observable information in non-transparent scenarios[J/OL]. Acta Armamentarii, 2026(2026-04-15). https://doi.org/10.12382/bgxb.2025.0966. (in Chinese)
薛羽阳,王涛. 非透明场景下基于指标关联特征的地面目标群价值评估方法[J/OL]. 兵工学报, 2026(2026-04-15). https://doi.org/10.12382/bgxb.2025.0966. DOI:
XUE Y Y, WANG T. A target group value assessment method driven by observable information in non-transparent scenarios[J/OL]. Acta Armamentarii, 2026(2026-04-15). https://doi.org/10.12382/bgxb.2025.0966. (in Chinese) DOI:
非透明场景中,目标群体内部结构的不可知性显著增加了地面目标价值评估的复杂性与不确定性。针对这一问题,提出一种基于指标关联特征的地面目标群价值评估方法。通过围绕群体层与个体层构建的双维度指标体系,并基于多源可观测信息设计指标量化模型,有效表征目标群体的协同能力与分布态势,以及个体成员的实时状态和功能。在层次分析法获得专家主观权重的基础上,引入动态关联-层级校准机制,采用互信息关联度、皮尔逊互补性和主成分预测性关联度等关联特征进行指标关联分析,并结合信息熵理论实现权重的自适应融合。仿真结果表明,该方法能够在非透明场景中下获得均衡、可解释的目标价值评估结果,评估模型且具有良好的实时性与鲁棒性。
In non-transparent scenarios
the unknown internal structure of target groups significantly increases the complexity and uncertainty of ground target value assessment. To address this issue
this paper proposes a ground target group value assessment method based on indicator association features. A dual-level indicator system is constructed at both the group and individual levels
and indicator quantification models are designed based on multi-source observable information to effectively represent the cooperative capability and distribution patterns of the target group
as well as the real-time status and functionality of individual members. Building on expert subjective weights obtained via the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
a dynamic correlation-hierarchicalcalibration(DCHC) mechanism is introduced. Indicator correlation analysis is performed using association features
including mutual information correlation
Pearson complementarity
and principal component predictive correlation
and adaptive weight fusion is achieved through information entropy theory. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method can provide balanced and interpretable target value assessments in non-transparent scenarios
with good real-time performance and robustness.
XIA W, ZHOU Z Y, JIANG W Y, et al. Dynamic UAV swarm confrontation: an Imitation based on mobile adaptive networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2023, 59(5):7183-7202.
GAO H L, ZHAO C M, YU X H, et al. Swarm confrontation algorithm for UGV swarm with quantity advantage by a novel MSRM-MAPOCA training method[J]. Actuators, 2025, 14(1):15.
陈文钰,李为民,张涛,等.基于作战交互网络的体系作战能力计算[J].兵工学报,2023, 44(10): 2885-2896.
CHEN W Y, LI W M, ZHANG T, et al. Calculation of system-of-systems combat capability based on combat interaction network[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(10): 2885-2896. (in Chinese)
SU Z Z, JI H B, TIAN C, et al. Performance evaluation for multi-target tracking with temporal dimension specifics[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2024, 37(2): 446-458.
GROSELJ P, DOLINAR G. Group AHP framework based on geometric standard deviation and interval group pairwise comparisons[J]. Information Sciences, 2023, 626: 370-389.
高俊吉, 王司霖, 朱雪莲.舰艇磁性对抗能力综合评估模型[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2024, 45(8):1559-1563.
GAO J J, WANG S L, ZHU X L.Comprehensive evaluation model for the magnetic confrontation capability of ships[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2024, 45(8): 1559-1563. (in Chinese)
KIZIELEWICZ B, TOMCZYK T, GANDOR M, et al. Subjective weight determination methods in multi-criteria decision-making: a systematic review[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2024, 246: 5396-5407.
解宝琦, 李英顺, 王德彪, 等.一种坦克炮长瞄准镜系统状态评估的方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(8): 2414-2423.
XIE B Q, LI Y S, WANG D B, et al. Method for evaluating tank gunner’s sight system[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(8): 2414-2423. (in Chinese)
WANG R F, LIU X F, ZHAO X Y, et al. A novel entropy-based method for quantifying urban energy demand aggregation: implications for urban planning and policy[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2024, 103: 105284.
ZHAN T X, ZHOU J F, LI Z, et al. Generalized information entropy and generalized information dimension[J]. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 2024, 184: 114976.
王凤山, 钱津. 基于变权TOPSIS模型的围岩质量评价方法研究[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2023, 43(1): 134-137,191.
WANG F S, QIAN J. Research on evaluation method of surrounding rock quality based on variable weight TOPSIS model[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2023, 43(1): 134-137,191. (in Chinese)
ZHENG K, FANG J, LI J Q, et al. Robust grey relational analysis-based accuracy evaluation method[J]. Applied Sciences, 2025, 15(9): 4926.
SHU P X, WANG C H, HUA Y Z, et al. Theory and experiment on distributed output formation tracking of unmanned aerial and ground vehicle swarm systems over jointly connected digraphs[J]. Control Engineering Practice, 2024, 152:106070.
YIN L G, YAN Z P, HOU Y Z. Formation transformation method for UUV group to approach a static target[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2023, 11(10): 2030.
GONG C T, YANG L, HUANG Q L. Threat assessment of air cluster targets based on dynamic Bayesian network with cloud model[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Autonomous Unmanned Systems. Nanjing, China: Springer, 2023: 372-381.
ZHANG P D, LIU Q, KANG B, et al. An improved OWA-fuzzy AHP decision model for multi-attribute decision making problem[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2021, 40(5): 9655-9668.
LI Y, LÜ Z G, DI R H, et al. Threat assessment method for UAV based on a Bayesian network with a small dataset[J]. Laser & Optoelectronics Progress, 2021, 58(16): 1628001.
LI H L, LI D, LI Y H. A multi-index assessment method for evaluating coverage effectiveness of remote sensing satellite[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2018, 31(10):2023-2033.
ZANG D M, SHENG X L, WANG L Y, et al. Research and application of warship multiattribute threat assessment based on improved TOPSIS gray association analysis[J]. International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics, 2022, 14(3): 223-236.
GUO Z L, HONG M, SHI J, et al. Research on optimal allocation of surface ship formation based on index method and multi-objective programming[J].Ocean Engineering, 2024, 305: 117952.
胡浩, 冯辅周, 朱俊臻, 等. 基于熵权-主客观赋权法的装备保障单元效能评估研究[J].现代防御技术, 2025, 53(1): 173-181.
HU H, FENG F Z, ZHU J Z, et al. Research on equipment support unit effectiveness evaluation based on entropy weighting-subjective and objective weighting method[J]. Modern Defense Technology, 2025, 53(1):173-181.(in Chinese)
徐克虎, 张明双, 李灵之.基于区间变权灰色关联法的集群目标威胁评估[J].电光与控制, 2019, 26(12): 6-11.
XU K H, ZHANG M S, LI L Z.Cluster target threat assessment based on interval variable weight grey correlation method[J]. Electronics Optics & Control, 2019, 26(12): 6-11. (in Chinese)
孔德鹏, 常天庆, 郝娜, 等.地面作战目标威胁评估多属性指标处理方法[J].自动化学报, 2021, 47(1):161-172.
KONG D P, CHANG T Q, HAO N, et al. Multi-attribute index processing method of target threat assessment in ground combat[J].Acta Automatica Sinica, 2021, 47(1): 161-172. (in Chinese)
刘诗瑶, 王明, 习朝辉, 等.基于动态贝叶斯网络的无人战车目标威胁评估[J].火力与指挥控制,2021,46(4):59-64.
LIU S Y, WANG M, XI C H, et al. Threat assessment of unmanned combat vehicle target based on dynamic bayesian network[J]. Firepower and Command Control, 2021, 46(4): 59-64. (in Chinese)
BOUHOU I, FORTUNATI S, GHARSALLI L, et al. POMDP-driven cognitive massive MIMO Radar: joint target detection-tracking in unknown disturbances[J].IEEE Transactions on Radar Systems, 2025, 3: 539-548.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CNKI被引量
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024360号