SUN K P, XU Y D, MIAO W, et al. Dynamic-effect hydraulic resistance model and validation for recoil mechanisms[J/OL]. Acta Armamentarii, 2026(2026-03-02). https://doi.org/10.12382/bgxb.2025.0912. (in Chinese)
SUN K P, XU Y D, MIAO W, et al. Dynamic-effect hydraulic resistance model and validation for recoil mechanisms[J/OL]. Acta Armamentarii, 2026(2026-03-02). https://doi.org/10.12382/bgxb.2025.0912. (in Chinese)DOI:
Dynamic-Effect Hydraulic Resistance Model and Validation for Recoil Mechanisms
Conventional hydraulic resistance calculation methods for recoil brakes introduce systematic errors by neglecting fluid dynamic effects and directly using the pressure in Chamber 1 for resistance evaluation. To address this issue
a theoretical calculation model incorporating fluid dynamic effects is developed based on the momentum theorem.To validate the proposed model
a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model of the recoil brake is first established and calibrated using live-fire experimental data. Subsequently
one set of CFD results is employed to calibrate the theoretical model
while the remaining data are used for independent validation. The results demonstrate excellent agreement between the theoretical predictions and CFD data
with coefficients of determination R² exceeding 0.995and normalized errors mainly within ±5%.Furthermore
a direct hydraulic resistance measurement experiment is designed and conducted to quantitatively assess the influence of dynamic effects on hydraulic resistance calculations. The results indicate that the conventional method systematically overestimates the hydraulic resistance during the mid-recoil stage
with a maximum deviation of up to 21.5%. The proposed theoretical model effectively eliminates the errors induced by dynamic effects and enables the correction of key structural parameters
providing a more reliable hydraulic resistance calculation approach for firing dynamics analysis and recoil brake design.
关键词
Keywords
references
钱林方,徐亚栋,陈龙淼. 车载炮设计理论和方法[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2022.
QIAN L F, XU Y D, CHEN L M. Design theory and methods of vehicle-mounted howitzer[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2022. (in Chinese)
谈乐斌,张相炎,潘孝斌,等. 火炮概论[M]. 北京:北京理工大学出版社,2014.
TAN L B, ZHANG X Y, PAN X B, et al. Introduction to artillery[M]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2014. (in Chinese)
赵纪华. 火炮最优射击稳定性设计研究[J]. 振动与冲击,2010, 29(11): 91-93.
ZHAO J H. Study on design of optimal firing stability of gun[J]. J. Vib. Shock, 2010, 29(11): 91-93. (in Chinese)
ZHOU L, YANG G L, GE J L, et al. Structural multi-objective optimization of artillery recoil mechanism based on genetic algorithm[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(3): 433-436. (in Chinese)
LI R, SUN Q Z, ZHANG J, et al. Multiple attribute decision making with interval uncertainty for artillery recoil resistance[J]. Trans. FAMENA, 2020, 44(3): 59-71.
GUO S Q, HOU B L. Simulation and parameters intelligent optimization of soft recoil system[C]//2020 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC). Shanghai, China: IEEE, 2020: 3663-3668.
PAN X B, SONG Y M, TAN L B. Analysis on mainstream hydraulic resistance coefficient of cylinder wall groove recoil mechanism[J]. J. Vib. Shock, 2016, 35(17): 146-150. (in Chinese)
BAO D, HOU B L. Parameters identification of a cannon counter-recoil mechanism based on PSO and interval analysis theory[J]. Vibroeng. Procedia, 2018, 20: 248-253.
ZHAO W, HOU B L, BAO D. Multi-parameter identification of soft recoil artillery launch process using IICCA[J]. J. Vib. Shock, 2023, 42(21): 43-51. (in Chinese)
WANG L Q, YANG G, XIAO H, et al. Interval optimization for structural dynamic responses of an artillery system under uncertainty[J]. Eng. Optim., 2020, 52(2): 343-366.
XU F J, YANG G L, WANG L Q, et al. Artillery structural dynamic responses optimization based on Stackelberg game method[J]. J. Low Freq. Noise Vib. Active Control, 2022, 41(1): 140-159.
CHARTON H, PERRET C, PHAN H T. Analysis of supersonic flows inside a steam ejector with liquid–vapor phase change using CFD simulations[J]. Thermo, 2024, 4(1): 1-15.
SUN Y Z, QIN J Q, DI C C, et al. Simulation analysis on interior flow field of recoil brake based on dynamic mesh[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 765: 427-430.
ZHANG X D, ZHANG P L, FU J P, et al. Numerical simulation of flow field in gun recoil mechanism based on dynamic mesh[J]. J. Nanjing Univ. Sci. Technol., 2010, 34(4): 533-536. (in Chinese)
ELSAADY W A, IBRAHIM A Z, ABDALLA A A. Numerical simulation of flow field in coaxial tank gun recoil damper[J]. Advances in Military Technology, 2019, 14(1): 139-150.
JEVTIĆ D, MICKOVIĆ D, ELEK P, et al. Analysis of the influence parameters on the pressure field in the hydraulic brake[C]//Proceedings of the 9th International Scientific Conference OTEH 2020. Belgrade, Serbia: Military Technical Institute, 2020.
DING C J, ZHANG X Y. Numerical simulation of interior flow field cavitation of gun recoil brake[J]. Mach. Build. Autom., 2015, 44(5): 93-95. (in Chinese)
ZHANG X D, ZHANG P L, FU J P, et al. Analysis and calculation of gun recoil based on CFD and collaborative simulation[J]. J. Ballist., 2010, 22(3): 30-34. (in Chinese)
ZHANG X D, ZHANG P L, FU J P, et al. Applicability analysis of k-ε turbulence models on numerical simulation of internal flow field of recoil mechanism[J]. Explos. Shock Waves, 2011, 31(5): 516-520. (in Chinese)
SHI X L, PAN X B, GAO Q X. Study on cushioning performance of a valve-controlled recoil mechanism[J]. J. Ord. Equip. Eng., 2022, 43(9): 201-205. (in Chinese)
PENG S J, ZHOU C, YU C G. The numerical simulation of three-dimensional dynamic-mesh flow field of a hydraulic buffer[J]. Adv Mat Res, 2012, 588: 1264-1268.
KURNIAWAN R, PUDJAPRASETYA S R, SULVIANURI R. Numerical study of two-dimensional sediment transport using momentum-conserving staggered grid scheme[J]. J. Comput. Sci., 2025, 92: 102714.
SLODIČKA M. Reynolds Transport Theorem for dualities with jumping coefficients[J]. J. Comput. Appl. Math., 2026, 475: 117003.
QIAN L F, LIANG C, CHEN G S. Flow field mechanics mechanism of large-caliber soft recoil artillery brakes[J]. Sci. Sin. Technol., 2025, 55(8): 1281-1296. (in Chinese)
MONAGHAN J J. Simulating free surface flows with SPH[J]. J. Comput. Phys., 1994, 110(2): 399-406.
LI G D, LYU W M, LI Y Q. Research on the impact of surface tension on phase change mass transfer in the Schnerr-Sauer model and its effects on cavitation simulation in pump[J]. Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 2025, 218: 780-793.
LIU M Y, JIANG C, KHOO B C, et al. A cell-based smoothed finite element model for the analysis of turbulent flow using realizable k-ε model and mixed meshes[J]. J. Comput. Phys., 2024, 501: 112783.
PRIYADUMKOL J, MUANGPUT B, NAMCHANTHRA S, et al. CFD modelling of vertical-axis wind turbines using transient dynamic mesh towards lateral vortices capturing and Strouhal number[J]. Energy Convers. Manag. X, 2025, 26: 101022.
FRANZ A, WEI H, GUASTONI L, et al. PICT–A differentiable, GPU-accelerated multi-block PISO solver for simulation-coupled learning tasks in fluid dynamics[J]. J. Comput. Phys., 2026, 544: 114433.