
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
部队, 北京 100072
Received:21 August 2025,
Online First:03 February 2026,
Published:2025
移动端阅览
Mei ZHANG, Junfang HOU, Juan LI, et al. An Operational Mission Evaluation Method for Unmanned Ground Vehicles based on Mission Profiles and Hierarchical Evaluation Index System[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(S2): 250768.
Mei ZHANG, Junfang HOU, Juan LI, et al. An Operational Mission Evaluation Method for Unmanned Ground Vehicles based on Mission Profiles and Hierarchical Evaluation Index System[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(S2): 250768. DOI: 10.12382/bgxb.2025.0768.
为评价地面车辆自主能力等级
研究其执行典型任务的复杂度分级和评价方法。通过分析不同的任务类型并划分任务剖面
建立层次评价指标体系
确定场景地图和任务要求两个一级评价指标
任务要求的二级评价指标依据任务剖面划分。将任务按时序分解为子任务
子任务的评价指标分为要求类和特征类难度项。应用层次分析法评价上述指标
将其加权汇总得到任务复杂度。通过典型的复杂度评价案例
验证了该方法的有效性。
In order to evaluate the autonomous capability level of unmanned ground vehicles (UAVs)
the complexity level and evaluation method of typical missions performed by UAVs are studied.The types of missions are analyzed
and the mission profiles of different types of missions are divided.A hierarchical evaluation index system (HEIS) of mission complexity is established
and two first-level evaluation indexes
scenario map and mission requirement
are determined.The second-level evaluation indexes of mission requirement are determined according to the mission profile.A mission is decomposed into sub-missions in chronological order
and the evaluation index of each sub-mission is divided into the requirement-type and feature-type difficulty items.The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is applied to evaluate the typical operational missions according to the above indexes
and the mission complexity is obtained from the weighted summary of evaluation indexes at all levels.The effectiveness of this method is verified by a typical complexity evaluation example.
HUANG H M . Autonomy levels for unmanned systems (ALFUS) framework:safety and application issues [C ] //Proceedings of the Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems.Gaithersburg,MD, US:NIST , 2007 .
史辉 , 刘向前 . 地面无人平台在典型战场环境中的自主机动性能评价研究 [J ] . 兵工学报 , 2014 , 35 ( 增刊1 ): 17 - 24 .
SHI H , LIU X Q . Assessment method for autonomous mobility of UGV in a typical battlefield environment [J ] . Acta Armamentarii , 2014 , 35 ( S1 ): 17 - 24 . (in Chinese)
于丽莉 , 何明利 , 常书杰 . 地面无人装备自主作战效能评估方法研究 [J ] . 军事运筹与系统工程 , 2020 , 34 ( 3 ): 25 - 32 .
YU L L , HE M L , CHANG S J . Research on autonomous combat effectiveness evaluation methods for ground unmanned equipment [J ] . Military Operations Research and Systems Engineering , 2020 , 34 ( 3 ): 25 - 32 . (in Chinese)
苏治宝 , 王宏明 , 杨甜甜 , 等 . 地面无人作战平台性能评价指标体系 [J ] . 火力与指挥控制 , 2012 , 37 ( 3 ): 154 - 157 .
SU Z B , WANG H M , YANG T T , et al. Research on performance evaluation indexes for unmanned ground vehicles [J ] . Fire Control &Command Control , 2012 , 37 ( 3 ): 154 - 157 . (in Chinese)
李文璋 , 陶业荣 , 唐川 . 基于多专家信息融合 Fuzzy-EAHP 的地面无人平台自主能力评估方法 [J ] . 火力与指挥控制 , 2024 , 49 ( 11 ): 157 - 168 .
LI W Z , TAO Y R , TANG C . Autonomous capability evaluation method of UGVs based on multi-expert formation fusion Fuzzy-EAHP [J ] . Fire Control & Command Control , 2024 , 49 ( 11 ): 157 - 168 . (in Chinese)
郑剑 . 面向任务的无人作战系统自主性等级评估与分配技术研究 [D ] . 北京 : 国防科技大学 , 2019 .
ZHENG J . Research on autonomy levels evaluation and assignment technology of mission-oriented unmanned combat system [D ] . Beijing : National University of Defense Technology , 2019 . (in Chinese)
孙扬 , 杨贺 . 无人驾驶车辆智能水平等级划分 [J ] . 科技导报 , 2017 , 35 ( 17 ): 80 - 83 .
SUN Y , YANG H . Intelligent capability level classification for unmanned vehicles [J ] . Science & Technology Review , 2017 , 35 ( 17 ): 80 - 83 . (in Chinese)
王培 , 张杰飞 . 自动驾驶车辆综合智能评价量化分析 [J ] . 内燃机与配件 , 2023 ( 10 ): 29 - 31 .
WANG P , ZHANG J F . Quantitative analysis of comprehensive intelligent evaluation for autonomous vehicles [J ] . Internal Combustion Engines and Spare Parts , 2023 ( 10 ): 29 - 31 . (in Chinese)
薛俊山 , 蒋瑜 . 智能无人装备自主性评价研究进展与探索 [C ] // 第四届体系工程学术会议——数字化转型中的体系工程 . 厦门 : 国防科技大学系统工程学院 , 2022 .
XUE J S , JIANG Y . Research progress and exploration on of autonomous evaluation of unmanned intelligent equipment [C ] // Proceedings of the 4th Academic Conference on System Engineering-System Engineering in Digital Transformation . Xiamen : School of System Engineering ,National University of Defense Technology, 2022 . (in Chinese)
唐宏博 , 田雅雯 , 蒋瑜 . 自主无人装备智能化水平评价研究进展及思考 [C ] // 第六届体系工程学术会议——体系工程与高质量发展 . 昆明:国防科技大学,2024:11.
TANG H B,TIAN Y W,JIANG Y. Research progress and thinking on intelligent level evaluation of autonomous unmanned equipment [C ] // Peoceedings of the 6th Academic Conference on System Engineering-System Engineering and High-Quality Development . Kunming : National University of Defense Technology , 2024 : 11 . (in Chinese)
NI H L , WU J . A method for evaluating the complexity of autonomous driving roadscene [J ] . IET Intelligent Transport Systems , 2022 , 16 ( 12 ): 1562 - 1573 .
ISSLER M , GOSS Q , AKBAS M I . Complexity evaluation of test scenarios for autonomous vehicle safety validation using information theory [J ] . IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , 2021 , 22 ( 8 ): 4943 - 4955 .
LIU T Y , WANG C , YINZ Q , et al. Complexity quantification of driving scenarios with dynamic evolution characteristics [J ] . Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies , 2020 , 111 : 358 - 373 .
李道飞 , 潘豪 . 场景复杂度评估在轨迹预测和驾驶决策中的应用 [J ] . 汽车工程 , 2024 , 46 ( 9 ): 77 - 86 .
LI D F , PAN H . Application of scenario complexity evaluation in trajectory prediction and automated driving decision-making [J ] . Automotive Engineering , 2024 , 46 ( 9 ): 77 - 86 . (in Chinese)
GARIKAPATI D , SHETIYA S S . Autonomous vehicles:evolution of artificial intelligence and the current industry landscape [J ] . Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers,Part I:Journal of Systems and Control Engineering , 2021 , 235 ( 10 ): 1269 - 1285 .
ZHANG P X , ZHU B , ZHAOJ , et al. Performance evaluation method for automated driving system in logical scenario [J ] . IEEE Access , 2021 , 9 : 145285 - 145295 .
ZHOU J J , WANG L , WANG X F . Scalable evaluation methods for autonomous vehicles [J ] . IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles , 2022 , 7 ( 2 ): 164 - 175 .
LLORCA D F , HAMON R , JUNKLEWITZ H , et al. Testing autonomous vehicles and AI:perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity,transparency,robustness and fairness [J ] . European Transport Research Review , 2025 , 17 : 38 .
THRUN S , MONTEMERLO M , PALATUCCI M . Stanley:the robot that won the DARPA grandchallenge [J ] . Journal of Field Robotics , 2009 , 23 ( 9 ): 661 - 692 .
BOHREN J , FOOTE T . LittleBen:the Ben Franklin Racing Team’s entry in the 2007 DARPA urban challenge [J ] . Journal of Field Robotics , 2008 , 25 ( 9 ): 598 - 614 .
QI C , OZGUNER U , REDMILL K . Ohio State University at the 2004 DARPA grand challenge:developing a completely autonomousvehicle [J ] . IEEE Intelligent Systems , 2004 , 19 ( 5 ): 8 - 11 .
NAGENDRAN A , CROWTHER W , TURNER M , et al . Design,control, and performance of the ‘weed’6 wheel robot in the UK MOD grand challenge [J ] . Advanced Robotics , 2014 , 28 ( 4 ): 203 - 218 .
SCHNEIDER F E , WILDERMUTH D , WOLF H L . ELROB and EURATHLON:Improving search & rescue robotics through real-world robot competitions [C ] //Proceedings of the International Workshop on Robot Motion & #x00026; Control.Poznan, Poland:IEEE , 2015 .
BRÜGGEMANN B , WILDERMUTH D , SCHNEIDER F E . Search and retrieval of human casualties in outdoor environments with unmanned ground systems—system overview and lessons learned from ELROB 2014 [J ] . Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics , 2016 , 113 : 533 - 546 .
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CNKI被引量
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024360号