Dynamic Response Behaviors of Ti-6321 Titanium Alloys with Different Microstructures under Split Hopkinson Pressure BarLoading

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2021.04.020

Abstract

Abstract: Ti-6321 titanium alloys with different microstructures were obtained through solution treatment, and the influence of microstructure on the dynamic behavior of materials was studied. An universal testing machine and a split Hopkinson pressure bar test device, combined with the characterization methods such as optical microscope and scanning electron microscope, were used to characterize the microstructure evolution of loaded titanium alloy sample. The results demonstrate that the alloys with equiaxed, bimodal and Widmanstatten microstructures have obvious strain rate strengthening effect, and the critical shear fracture strain rates are all 3 000 s^-1. The bimodal structure has good strength and plastic combination under static and dynamic compression, Widmanstatten structure is poor, and the equiaxed structure has higher critical shear strain and impact absorption energy, which are 0.252 and 307 MJ·m^-3 , respectively. At the strain rate of 3 000 s^-1, the strain rate sensitivity factor of the equiaxed microstructure increases gradually, the strain rate sensitivity factor of Widmanstatten microstructure decreases, and the strain rate sensitivity factor of bimodal microstructure is unchanged with the increase in strain. When the strain is 5%, the strain rate sensitivity factors of equiaxed and bimodal microstructures increase with the increase in the strain rate, while the strain rate sensitivity factor of Widmanstatten microstrucutre is unchanged. Adiabatic shear failure occurs in all microstructures. Equiaxed structure has a low adiabatic shear sensitivity, and Widmanstatten structure has a high adiabatic shear sensitivity.

Key words: Ti-6321titaniumalloy, dynamicresponsebehavior, splitHopkinsonpressurebar, strainratesensitivity, adiabaticshearsensitivity

CLC Number:

TG146.23

NING Zixuan, WANG Lin, CHENG Xingwang, CHENG Huanwu, LIU Anjin, XU Xuefeng, ZHOU Zhe, ZHANG Binbin. Dynamic Response Behaviors of Ti-6321 Titanium Alloys with Different Microstructures under Split Hopkinson Pressure BarLoading[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(4): 862-870.

References

［1］ FAN R L, WU Y, CHEN M H, et al. Relationship among microstructure, mechanical properties and texture of TA32 titanium alloy sheets during hot tensile deformation[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2020, 30(4): 928-943.
[2］ ZHOU T F, WU J J, CHE J T, et al. Dynamic shear characteristics of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V at large strain rates by the split Hopkinson pressure bar test[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2017, 109:167-177.
[3］ QI L C, QIAO X L, HUANG L J, et al. Effect of structural stabi-lity on the stress induced martensitic transformation in Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al alloy[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2019, 756: 381-388.
[4］ PEIRS J, VERLEYSEN P, DEGRIECK J, et al. The use of hat-shaped specimens to study the high strain rate shear behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2010, 37(6): 703-714.
[5］ REN Y, ZHOU S M, WANG Z W. Influence of shock pre-strain on the dynamic mechanical behavior and adiabatic shearing failure of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy with lamellar microstructure[J]. Enginee-ring Failure Analysis, 2020, 111: 104500.
[6］ ALI A, CHEN P W, GUO Y S. Effects of microstructure on the dynamic properties of TA15 titanium alloy[J]. Mechanics of Materials, 2019, 137: 103121.
[7］ YANG H L, WANG D D, ZHU X J, et al. Dynamic compression-induced twins and martensite and their combined effects on the adiabatic shear behavior in a Ti-8.5Cr-l.5Sn alloy[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2019, 759: 203-209.
[8］ XIAO J F, NIE Z H, TAN C W, et al. Effect of reverse β-to-ω transformation on twinning and martensitic transformation in a metastable β titanium alloy[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2019, 759: 680-687.
[9］ ZHAN H Y, ZENG W D, WANG G, et al. Microstructural characteristics of adiabatic shear localization in a metastable beta tita-nium alloy deformed at high strain rate and elevated temperatures[J]. Materials Characterization, 2015, 102: 103-113.
[10］ SHARMA S, MAJILA A N, CHAVAN V M, et al. Deformation response of titanium alloy under static and dynamic loading[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 173: 1894-1900.
[11］ ZENER C, HOLLOMON J H. Effect of strain rate upon plastic flow of steel[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1944, 15(1): 22-32.
[12］ RAN C, SHENG Z M, CHEN P W, et al. Effect of microstructure on the mechanical properties of Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-1Cr-1Fe alloy[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2020, 773: 138728.
[13］朱新杰, 范群波, 余洪, 等. Ti-4.5Mo-5.1Al-1.8Zr-1.1Sn-2.5Cr-2.9Zn 钛合金的动态力学性能及失效研究[J]. 稀有金属材料与工程, 2020, 49(4): 1235-1241.
ZHU X J, FAN Q B, YU H, et al.Dynamic mechanical properties and failure of Ti-4.5Mo-5.1Al-1.8Zr-1.1Sn-2.5Cr-2.9Zn alloy [J]. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 2020, 49(4): 1235-1241. (in Chinese)
[14］ ALAGHMANDFARD R， CHALASANI D， HADADZADEH A, et al. Dynamic compressive response of electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V under elevated strain rates: microstructure and constitutive models[J]. Additive Manufacturing, 2020, 35: 101347.
[15］徐雪峰, 王琳, 沙彦刚, 等. TC4 ELI钛合金动态压缩性能及绝热剪切敏感性的研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(2): 366-373.
XU X F, WANG L, SHA Y G, et al. Research on dynamic mechanical properties of TC4 ELI titanium alloy and its sensitivity to adiabatic shear banding[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(2): 366-373. (in Chinese)
[16］郝晓博, 张强, 李渤渤, 等. α+β相区高温退火对Ti80合金板材组织与性能的影响[J]. 材料开发与应用，2018，33(1): 49-53.
HAO X B, ZHANG Q, LI B B, et al. Effect of high temperature annealing in α + β phase region on microstructure and properties of Ti80 alloy plates[J]. Development and Application of Materials, 2018, 33 (1): 49-53. (in Chinese)
[17］ ZHOU D D, ZENG W D, XU J W, et al. Evolution of equiaxed and lamellar α during hot compression in a near alpha titanium alloy with bimodal microstructure[J]. Materials Characterization, 2019, 151: 103-111.
[18］罗锦华, 朱燕丽, 孙小平, 等.热加工及热处理工艺对Ti80合金棒材组织和性能的影响[J]. 钛工业进展, 2016, 33(2): 20-24.
LUO J H, ZHU Y L, SUN X P, et al. Effects of hot working process and heat treatment on microstructures and mechanical properties of Ti80 alloy bars[J]. Titanium Industry Progress, 2016, 33(2): 20-24. (in Chinese)
[19］杜玉俊, 刘向宏, 李金山, 等. 12 t级Ti80合金铸锭的成分均匀性及其偏析规律[J]. 稀有金属材料与工程, 2020, 49(3): 883-889.
DU Y J, LIU X H, LI J S, et al. Uniformity and segregation in 12 t ingot of Ti80 alloy[J]. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 2020, 49(3): 883-889. (in Chinese)
[20］ GUO K, MENG K, MIAO D, et al. Effect of annealing on microstructure and tensile properties of skew hot rolled Ti-6Al-3Nb-2Zr-1Mo alloy tube[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2019, 766: 138346.
[21］ WANG Q, REN J Q, WU Y K, et al. Comparative study of crack growth behaviors of fully-lamellar and bi-lamellar Ti-6Al-3Nb-2Zr-1Mo alloy[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2019, 789: 249-255.
[22］ XIONG J H, LI S K, GAO F Y, et al. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti6321 alloy welded joint by GTAW[J]. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2015, 640: 419-423.
[23］徐雪峰, 王琳, 程兴旺, 等. Ti6321 钛合金在Taylor 杆冲击下的动态断裂微观组织观测[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(7): 1401-1407.
XU X F, WANG L, CHENG X W, et al. Dynamic observation of fracture microstructure of Ti6321titanium alloy in Taylor bar impact test[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(7): 1401-1407. (in Chinese)
[24］ SHI X H, ZHAO C, CAO Z H, et al. Mechanical behavior of a near α titanium alloy under dynamic compression: characterization and modeling[J]. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International, 2019, 29(4): 432-439.
[25］ LEYENS C, PETERS M. Titanium and titanium alloys: fundamentals and applications[M]. Weinheim, Germany: WILEY-VCH, 2003.
[26］ LI Z Z, WANG B F, ZHAO S T, et al. Dynamic deformation and failure of ultrafine-grained titanium[J]. Acta Materialia, 2017, 125: 210-218.
[27］ SHAHAN A R, TAHERI A K. Adiabatic shear bands in titanium and titanium alloys: a critical review[J]. Materials and Design, 1993, 14(4): 243-250.
[28］ REN Y, YU X D, TAN C W, et al. Dynamic mechanical pro-perties and adiabatic shearing behavior of the shock prestrained Ti-6Al-4V alloy having bimodal microstructure[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2019, 773: 1054-1063.

[1]	DANG Quanyong, GE Yanxin, GAO Yubo. Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Al₂O₃/SiC Composite Ceramic Subjected to Impact Loading [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(1): 175-180.
[2]	LI Dongwei， MIAO Feichao， ZHANG Xiangrong， XIONG Guosong， ZHOU Lin， ZHAO Shuangshuang. Dynamic Mechanical Properties of an Insensitive DNAN-based Melt-cast Explosive [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(11): 2344-2349.
[3]	HUANG Junhao, WANG Lin, LIU Xiaopin, XU Xuefeng, LIU Anjin, Tayyeb Ali, ZHOU Zhe, NING Zixuan, YANG Jiabin, ZHANG Binbin, CHENG Xingwang. Mechanical Properties and Ballistic Performance of Ti-6321 Alloy [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(1): 124-132.
[4]	XU Xuefeng， WANG Lin， SHA Yangang， YANG Siqi， LIU Anjin，TAYYEB Ali， ZHANG Binbin， ZHAO Denghui. Research on Dynamic Mechanical Properties of TC4 ELI Titanium Alloy and Its Sensitivity to Adiabatic Shear Banding [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(2): 366-373.