Acta Armamentarii ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 682-690.doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.1009
Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Zehao1,2(), XU Wenlong1(), WANG Cheng3(), JIA Shiyu3(), XUE Shengpeng1(), MA Dong3()
Received:
2022-11-01
Online:
2022-12-27
LI Zehao, XU Wenlong, WANG Cheng, JIA Shiyu, XUE Shengpeng, MA Dong. Experimental Study of Impact Energy Absorption of Aerogel Sandwich Structures[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(3): 682-690.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
冲击速度/(m•s-1) | 峰值力/kN | 压垮距离/mm | 比吸能/(J•kg-1) | 平均碰撞力/kN | 碰撞力效率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
v1=10.4 | 9.7 | 5.9 | 16.1 | 5.3 | 54.5 |
v2=15.4 | 14.6 | 6.6 | 28.7 | 8.3 | 56.9 |
v3=19.0 | 22.8 | 7.3 | 48.8 | 12.9 | 56.6 |
Table 1 Impact performance indicators of the aerogel sandwich structure under different impact speeds (Ta=10.0 mm)
冲击速度/(m•s-1) | 峰值力/kN | 压垮距离/mm | 比吸能/(J•kg-1) | 平均碰撞力/kN | 碰撞力效率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
v1=10.4 | 9.7 | 5.9 | 16.1 | 5.3 | 54.5 |
v2=15.4 | 14.6 | 6.6 | 28.7 | 8.3 | 56.9 |
v3=19.0 | 22.8 | 7.3 | 48.8 | 12.9 | 56.6 |
冲击速度/(m•s-1) | 峰值力/kN | 压垮距离/mm | 比吸能/(J•kg-1) | 平均碰撞力/kN | 碰撞力效率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
v1=10.4 | 7.3 | 6.8 | 18.5 | 4.4 | 61.0 |
v2=15.4 | 12.0 | 9.2 | 41.3 | 7.3 | 60.6 |
v3=19.0 | 19.7 | 9.6 | 64.9 | 11.1 | 56.4 |
Table 2 Impact performance indicators of the aerogel sandwich structure under different impact speeds (Ta=14.0 mm)
冲击速度/(m•s-1) | 峰值力/kN | 压垮距离/mm | 比吸能/(J•kg-1) | 平均碰撞力/kN | 碰撞力效率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
v1=10.4 | 7.3 | 6.8 | 18.5 | 4.4 | 61.0 |
v2=15.4 | 12.0 | 9.2 | 41.3 | 7.3 | 60.6 |
v3=19.0 | 19.7 | 9.6 | 64.9 | 11.1 | 56.4 |
冲击速度/(m•s-1) | 峰值力/kN | 压垮距离/mm | 比吸能/(J•kg-1) | 平均碰撞力/kN | 碰撞力效率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
v1=10.4 | 6.2 | 9.5 | 29.9 | 4.1 | 66.7 |
v2=15.4 | 10.8 | 11.8 | 64.5 | 7.2 | 66.5 |
v3=19.0 | 19.3 | 12.1 | 94.8 | 10.2 | 52.8 |
Table 3 Impact performance indicators of the aerogel sandwich structure under different impact speeds (Ta=18.0 mm)
冲击速度/(m•s-1) | 峰值力/kN | 压垮距离/mm | 比吸能/(J•kg-1) | 平均碰撞力/kN | 碰撞力效率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
v1=10.4 | 6.2 | 9.5 | 29.9 | 4.1 | 66.7 |
v2=15.4 | 10.8 | 11.8 | 64.5 | 7.2 | 66.5 |
v3=19.0 | 19.3 | 12.1 | 94.8 | 10.2 | 52.8 |
冲击速度/(m•s-1) | 峰值力/kN | 压垮距离/mm | 比吸能/(J•kg-1) | 平均碰撞力/kN | 碰撞力效率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
v1=10.4 | 6.6 | 10.2 | 37.6 | 4.2 | 63.5 |
v2=15.4 | 10.9 | 11.9 | 72.9 | 7.0 | 64.0 |
v3=19.0 | 17.4 | 12.2 | 96.2 | 8.9 | 50.9 |
Table 4 Impact performance indicators of the aerogel sandwich structure under different impact speeds (Ta=20.0 mm)
冲击速度/(m•s-1) | 峰值力/kN | 压垮距离/mm | 比吸能/(J•kg-1) | 平均碰撞力/kN | 碰撞力效率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
v1=10.4 | 6.6 | 10.2 | 37.6 | 4.2 | 63.5 |
v2=15.4 | 10.9 | 11.9 | 72.9 | 7.0 | 64.0 |
v3=19.0 | 17.4 | 12.2 | 96.2 | 8.9 | 50.9 |
冲击速度/(m•s-1) | 峰值力/kN | 压垮距离/mm | 比吸能/(J•kg-1) | 平均碰撞力/kN | 碰撞力效率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
v1=10.4 | 5.6 | 11.9 | 44.3 | 3.7 | 65.7 |
v2=15.4 | 11.9 | 14.7 | 87.9 | 5.9 | 49.3 |
v3=19.0 | 15.1 | 14.8 | 113.4 | 7.5 | 49.5 |
Table 5 Impact performance indicators of the aerogel sandwich structure under different impact speeds (Ta=22.0 mm)
冲击速度/(m•s-1) | 峰值力/kN | 压垮距离/mm | 比吸能/(J•kg-1) | 平均碰撞力/kN | 碰撞力效率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
v1=10.4 | 5.6 | 11.9 | 44.3 | 3.7 | 65.7 |
v2=15.4 | 11.9 | 14.7 | 87.9 | 5.9 | 49.3 |
v3=19.0 | 15.1 | 14.8 | 113.4 | 7.5 | 49.5 |
冲击速度/(m•s) | 峰值力/kN | 压垮距离/mm | 比吸能/(J•kg-1) | 平均碰撞力/kN | 碰撞力效率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
v1=10.4 | 5.8 | 13.6 | 49.1 | 2.9 | 49.9 |
v2=15.4 | 11.3 | 15.3 | 108.8 | 5.7 | 50.4 |
v3=19.0 | 14.5 | 15.6 | 145.2 | 7.4 | 51.2 |
Table 6 Impact performance indicators of the aerogel sandwich structure under different impact speeds (Ta=24.0 mm)
冲击速度/(m•s) | 峰值力/kN | 压垮距离/mm | 比吸能/(J•kg-1) | 平均碰撞力/kN | 碰撞力效率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
v1=10.4 | 5.8 | 13.6 | 49.1 | 2.9 | 49.9 |
v2=15.4 | 11.3 | 15.3 | 108.8 | 5.7 | 50.4 |
v3=19.0 | 14.5 | 15.6 | 145.2 | 7.4 | 51.2 |
冲击速度/(m•s-1) | 峰值力/kN | 压垮距离/mm | 比吸能/(J•kg-1) | 平均碰撞力/kN | 碰撞力效率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
v1=10.4 | 5.5 | 14.0 | 54.8 | 2.6 | 46.1 |
v2=15.4 | 9.1 | 15.5 | 109.3 | 4.6 | 50.6 |
v3=19.0 | 16.7 | 15.8 | 192.6 | 7.8 | 46.7 |
Table 7 Impact performance indicators of the aerogel sandwich structure under different impact speeds (Ta=26.0 mm)
冲击速度/(m•s-1) | 峰值力/kN | 压垮距离/mm | 比吸能/(J•kg-1) | 平均碰撞力/kN | 碰撞力效率/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
v1=10.4 | 5.5 | 14.0 | 54.8 | 2.6 | 46.1 |
v2=15.4 | 9.1 | 15.5 | 109.3 | 4.6 | 50.6 |
v3=19.0 | 16.7 | 15.8 | 192.6 | 7.8 | 46.7 |
[1] |
doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.722 URL |
[2] |
doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104392 URL |
[3] |
余同希, 朱凌, 许骏. 结构冲击动力学进展(2010-2020)[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2021, 41(12): 1-61.
|
doi: 10.1007/s10573-005-0001-7 URL |
|
[4] |
刘志芳, 王军, 秦庆华. 横向冲击载荷下泡沫铝夹芯双圆管的吸能研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(11): 2259-2267.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2017.11.024 |
|
|
[5] |
doi: 10.3390/ma14164731 URL |
[6] |
霍新涛. 铝蜂窝三明治结构耐撞性能研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2018.
|
|
|
[7] |
doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114453 URL |
[8] |
doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121996 URL |
[9] |
doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.148 URL |
[10] |
doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.107188 URL |
[11] |
|
[12] |
doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104137 URL |
[13] |
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106683 URL |
[14] |
|
[15] |
doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.09.025 URL |
[16] |
doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108344 URL |
[17] |
doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.108120 URL |
[18] |
doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114994 URL |
[19] |
doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112992 URL |
[20] |
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106704 URL |
[21] |
doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.12.001 URL |
[22] |
doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111030 URL |
[23] |
许鲁. SiO2气凝胶混杂芳纶非织布抗冲击波性能的研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江理工大学, 2017.
|
|
|
[24] |
杨杰, 李树奎, 闫丽丽, 等. 二氧化硅气凝胶的防爆震性能及机理研究[J]. 物理学报, 2010, 59(12):8934-8940.
|
doi: 10.7498/aps URL |
|
[25] |
doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103509 URL |
[1] | LIU Yan, WANG Baichuan, YAN Junbo, YAN Zichen, SHI Zhenqing, HUANG Fenglei. Dynamic Response of Honeycomb Sandwich Plate with Negative Poisson’s Ratio under Penetration [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(7): 1938-1953. |
[2] | PAN Teng, BIAN Xiaobing, YUAN Mingzheng, WANG Liangliang, HUANG Yuan, HUANG Guangyan, ZHANG Hong. Dynamic Response of Polyurethane-hemisphere Sandwich Structure under Action of Explosive Shock Wave [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(12): 3580-3589. |
[3] | WANG Hao, XU Bin, WANG Shu, XU Yongjie, WU Hao. Explosion Impact Protection Performance of Sandwich Structure with Box-shaped Cores [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(12): 3687-3695. |
[4] | KONG Guoqiang, WANG Kang, YU Qiubing, LI Ying, WEI Huazhen, SHAO Meng, BI Weidong, LIU Benxue, YIN Lei, SUN Xiaodong. Properties of Aerogel Modified Quartz Fiber Reinforced Silicone Wave-transparent Composites [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2022, 43(2): 442-450. |
[5] | YANG Jie, LI Shu-kui, WANG Fu-chi. Research on the Anti-bullet Performance of Composite Structure with Aerogel Interlayer [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2012, 33(8): 921-926. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||