Acta Armamentarii ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8): 2391-2403.doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.0248
Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Bing, HAO Xinhong*(), ZHOU Wen, YANG Jin
Received:
2022-04-11
Online:
2023-08-30
Contact:
HAO Xinhong
CLC Number:
LIU Bing, HAO Xinhong, ZHOU Wen, YANG Jin. Recognition Method of Target and Sweep Jamming Signal for FM Radio Fuze Based on BAS-BPNN[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(8): 2391-2403.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
部件 | 参数 | 参数设置 |
---|---|---|
载波频率 | f0 | |
引信 | 调制频偏 | ΔF |
调制信号频率 | fm | |
干扰机 | 扫频带宽 | f0±ΔF |
扫频步长 |
Table 1 Experimental parameters setting
部件 | 参数 | 参数设置 |
---|---|---|
载波频率 | f0 | |
引信 | 调制频偏 | ΔF |
调制信号频率 | fm | |
干扰机 | 扫频带宽 | f0±ΔF |
扫频步长 |
迭代次数 | 识别准确率/% | 迭代次数 | 识别准确率/% |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 58.13±2.2316×10-16 | 16 | 99.71±0.0070 |
2 | 58.13±2.2316×10-16 | 17 | 99.72±0.0063 |
3 | 58.13±2.2316×10-16 | 18 | 99.73±0.0057 |
4 | 58.13±2.2316×10-16 | 19 | 99.84±0.0053 |
5 | 58.19±0.0026 | 20 | 99.86±0.0050 |
6 | 59.38±0.0241 | 21 | 99.92±0.0023 |
7 | 64.70±0.0590 | 22 | 99.91±0.0026 |
8 | 76.04±0.0949 | 23 | 99.93±0.0026 |
9 | 84.18±0.0835 | 24 | 99.94±0.0026 |
10 | 92.72±0.0621 | 25 | 99.95±0.0019 |
11 | 94.74±0.0461 | 26 | 99.96±0.0016 |
12 | 98.09±0.0211 | 27 | 99.93±0.0026 |
13 | 98.83±0.0142 | 28 | 99.94±0.0024 |
14 | 99.43±0.0098 | 29 | 99.96±0.0015 |
15 | 99.50±0.0104 | 30 | 99.96±0.0016 |
Table 2 Recognition accuracy varying with the number of iterations
迭代次数 | 识别准确率/% | 迭代次数 | 识别准确率/% |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 58.13±2.2316×10-16 | 16 | 99.71±0.0070 |
2 | 58.13±2.2316×10-16 | 17 | 99.72±0.0063 |
3 | 58.13±2.2316×10-16 | 18 | 99.73±0.0057 |
4 | 58.13±2.2316×10-16 | 19 | 99.84±0.0053 |
5 | 58.19±0.0026 | 20 | 99.86±0.0050 |
6 | 59.38±0.0241 | 21 | 99.92±0.0023 |
7 | 64.70±0.0590 | 22 | 99.91±0.0026 |
8 | 76.04±0.0949 | 23 | 99.93±0.0026 |
9 | 84.18±0.0835 | 24 | 99.94±0.0026 |
10 | 92.72±0.0621 | 25 | 99.95±0.0019 |
11 | 94.74±0.0461 | 26 | 99.96±0.0016 |
12 | 98.09±0.0211 | 27 | 99.93±0.0026 |
13 | 98.83±0.0142 | 28 | 99.94±0.0024 |
14 | 99.43±0.0098 | 29 | 99.96±0.0015 |
15 | 99.50±0.0104 | 30 | 99.96±0.0016 |
训练样本占比 | 1/10 | 1/9 | 1/8 | 1/7 | 1/6 | 1/5 | 1/4 | 1/3 | 1/2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
识别准确率/% | 99.78± 0.0077 | 99.81± 0.0056 | 99.85± 0.0045 | 99.90± 0.0023 | 99.84± 0.0037 | 99.94± 0.0015 | 99.89± 0.0030 | 99.92± 0.0022 | 99.93± 0.0027 |
Table 3 Recognition accuracy varying with the proportion of training samples
训练样本占比 | 1/10 | 1/9 | 1/8 | 1/7 | 1/6 | 1/5 | 1/4 | 1/3 | 1/2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
识别准确率/% | 99.78± 0.0077 | 99.81± 0.0056 | 99.85± 0.0045 | 99.90± 0.0023 | 99.84± 0.0037 | 99.94± 0.0015 | 99.89± 0.0030 | 99.92± 0.0022 | 99.93± 0.0027 |
训练样本 占比 | 迭代次数 | 识别准确率/% | |
---|---|---|---|
BAS-BPNN算法 | BPNN算法 | ||
15 | 99.50±0.0104 | 97.8619±0.0097 | |
2/3 | 20 | 99.86±0.0050 | 98.3886±0.0042 |
25 | 99.95±0.0019 | 98.5979±0.0013 | |
15 | 99.29±0.0123 | 97.6666±0.0116 | |
1/3 | 20 | 99.78±0.0050 | 98.1846±0.0047 |
25 | 99.94±0.0016 | 98.5865±0.0006 |
Table 4 Recognition accuracy varying with different methods
训练样本 占比 | 迭代次数 | 识别准确率/% | |
---|---|---|---|
BAS-BPNN算法 | BPNN算法 | ||
15 | 99.50±0.0104 | 97.8619±0.0097 | |
2/3 | 20 | 99.86±0.0050 | 98.3886±0.0042 |
25 | 99.95±0.0019 | 98.5979±0.0013 | |
15 | 99.29±0.0123 | 97.6666±0.0116 | |
1/3 | 20 | 99.78±0.0050 | 98.1846±0.0047 |
25 | 99.94±0.0016 | 98.5865±0.0006 |
[1] |
崔占忠, 宋世和, 徐立新. 近炸引信原理[M]. 第3版. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 2009: 76-100.
|
|
|
[2] |
赵惠昌. 无线电引信设计原理与方法[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2012: 35-62.
|
|
|
[3] |
汪仪林, 马秋华, 张龙山, 等. 引信智能化发展构想[J]. 探测与控制学报, 2018, 40(3): 1-5.
|
|
|
[4] |
汪仪林, 张龙山, 马秋华. 从美军标看我国引信安全性的差距[J]. 探测与控制学报, 2019, 41(3): 1-5.
|
|
|
[5] |
doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2020.102679 URL |
[6] |
代健, 李泽, 郝新红, 等. 基于目标联合特征提取的脉冲多普勒引信抗干扰方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(2): 225-233.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.02.001 |
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.02.001 |
|
[7] |
doi: 10.1109/Access.6287639 URL |
[8] |
|
[9] |
doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3075909 URL |
[10] |
doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2015.2440769 URL |
[11] |
郝新红, 杜涵宇, 陈齐乐. 调频引信粗糙面目标与干扰信号识别[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2019, 45(10):1946-1955.
|
|
|
[12] |
刘歌, 张国毅, 田榛熔. 基于时频图像三维熵特征的雷达信号识别[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2016, 41(12):169-173.
|
|
|
[13] |
谢平, 杜义浩, 黄双峰. 基于信息熵的复杂机械系统非线性特征提取方法研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2008, 27(7):135-137.
|
|
|
[14] |
张葛祥, 胡来招, 金炜东. 基于熵特征的雷达辐射源信号识别[J]. 电波科学学报, 2005, 20(4): 30-35.
|
|
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
doi: 10.2298/FIL2015113J URL |
[18] |
周志华. 机器学习[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2016: 97-114.
|
|
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
doi: 10.1109/JMW.2023.3285610 URL |
[1] | SONG Xiaoru, LIU Kang, GAO Song, CHEN Chaobo, YAN Kun. Research on Improved YOLOv5-based Military Target Recognition Algorithm Used in Complex Battlefield Environment [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(3): 934-947. |
[2] | ZHAO Xiaodong, ZHANG Xunying. Optimization Algorithm of Autonomous Target Recognition for Unmanned Vehicles Based on YOLOv5 [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(9): 2732-2744. |
[3] | HUO Jian, CHEN Huimin, MA Yunfei, GUO Pengyu, YANG Xu, MENG Xiangsheng. Vehicle Target Recognition Algorithm Based on MEMS LiDAR [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(4): 940-948. |
[4] | DING Bosheng, ZHANG Ruiheng, XU Lixin, CHEN Huiming. Sand-dust Image Restoration Using Gray Compensation and Feature Fusion [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(10): 3115-3126. |
[5] | WANG Shu-guang, ZENG Xiang-yang, WANG Zheng, WANG Qiang. Gammatone Subband Denoising and HHT-based Feature Extraction for Underwater Targets [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(9): 1704-1709. |
[6] | LI Cheng, LI Jian-xun, TONG Zhong-xiang, JIA Lin-tong, ZHANG Zhi-bo. Research on Partial Image Recognition and Tracking in Infrared Imaging Terminal Guidance [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(7): 1213-1221. |
[7] | SU Juan, YANG Luo, ZHANG Yang-yang. Infrared Target Recognition Algorithm Based on Contour Fragment Matching and Graph Searching [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(5): 854-860. |
[8] | ZHANG Peng-fei, LIU Wei, JIANG Ze-lin, LIU Ji-yuan, ZHANG Chun-hua. Research on Shadow Enhancement for Synthetic Aperture Sonar Images [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(2): 305-312. |
[9] | LIU Hui, YANG Jun-an, WANG Yi, CAI Xue-liang. An Improved Isometric Mapping Algorithm Based on New Geodesic Distance and Its Application in theFeature Extraction of Acoustic Targets [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2012, 33(10): 1178-1184. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||