Research on Impact Resistance and Failure Modes of Pyramid Sandwich Panel Subjected to Underwater Explosion

doi:10.12382/bgxb.2022.0147

Abstract

Abstract:

Studying the dynamic response and impact resistance of metal sandwich panels subjected to underwater explosion is of great significance for improving the protection capability of ships. An equivalent loading device for underwater explosion impact experiment is used for the pyramid lattice sandwich panel, and the dynamic response law of the panel is obtained. The Abaqus coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian method is adopted to calculate the impact process, and the error between the calculated results and the experimental data is small. The validity of the simulation is verified. The three-stage characteristics of the dynamic response of the pyramid sandwich panel is acquired. The impact resistance of the sandwich panel is evaluated through the deformation of the back plate and the plastic energy absorption of the core layer. The different failure modes of the sandwich panels with different parameters are analyzed by simulations. The results show that: when the total thickness of the sandwich panel is constant, the impact resistance of the sandwich panel with a thinner front panel and a thicker back panel is stronger; the failure modes of the core layer composed of pyramid rods with different thicknesses vary, but the deformations of the back panels are similar; the plastic energy absorption ratio of the core layer decreases with the increase of impact load; the multi-objective optimization method is used to optimize the parameters of the core layer. The conclusion is that the impact resistance of the optimized sandwich panel is significantly improved, and the optimization results have guiding significance for the design of pyramid sandwich panels.

Key words: underwater explosion, pyramid sandwich panel, coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian simulation, impact resistance

LI Furong, RONG Jili, WANG Xi, CHEN Zichao, WEI Zhenqian, ZHAO Zitong. Research on Impact Resistance and Failure Modes of Pyramid Sandwich Panel Subjected to Underwater Explosion[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(7): 1954-1965.

Figures/Tables 30

References 21

[1]	XUE Z Y, HUTCHINSON J W. A comparative study of impulse-resistant metal sandwich plates[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2004, 30(10): 1283-1305. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.08.007 URL
[2]	WEI Z, DHARMASENA K P, WADLEY H N G, et al. Analysis and interpretation of a test for characterizing the response of sandwich panels to water blast[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2007, 34(10): 1602-1618. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.09.091 URL
[3]	DHARMASENA K P, QUEHEILLALT D T, WADLEY H N G, et al. Dynamic compression of metallic sandwich structures during planar impulsive loading in water[J]. European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids, 2010, 29(1): 56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2009.05.003 URL
[4]	DHARMASENA K, QUEHEILLALT D, WADLEY H, et al. Dynamic response of a multilayer prismatic structure to impulsive loads incident from water[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(4): 632-643. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.06.002 URL
[5]	FAN Z Q, LIU Y B, XU P. Blast resistance of metallic sandwich panels subjected to proximity underwater explosion[J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2016, 93: 128-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.03.001 URL
[6]	ZHOU T Y, CHENG Y S, ZHAO Y J, et al. Experimental investigation on the performance of PVC foam core sandwich panels subjected to contact underwater explosion[J]. Composite Structures, 2020, 235: 111796. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111796 URL
[7]	DESHPANDE V, FLECK N. One-dimensional response of sandwich plates to underwater shock loading[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2005, 53(11): 2347-2383. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2005.06.006 URL
[8]	项大林, 荣吉利, 何轩, 等. 等效水下爆炸冲击加载装置的设计研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(6): 857-863. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.06.016
	XIANG D L, RONG J L, HE X, et al. Development of an equivalent equipment on underwater explosion impulsive loading[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 5(6): 857-863. (in Chinese)
[9]	项大林, 荣吉利, 何轩, 等. 基于三维数字图像相关方法的水下冲击载荷作用下铝板动力学响应研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(8):1210-1217. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.08.012
	XIANG D L, RONG J L, HE X, et al. Dynamics analysis of Al plate subjected to underwater impulsive loads based on 3D DIC[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(8):1210-1217. (in Chinese)
[10]	任鹏, 周潇, 周佳琪. 水下爆炸作用下船用加筋板动态响应特性分析[J]. 江苏科技大学学报, 2018, 32(1):7-12.
	RENG P, ZHOU X, ZHOU J Q. Dynamic response characteristics of stiffened plates subjected to underwater blast loading[J]. Journal of Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, 2018, 32(1):7-12. (in Chinese)
[11]	任鹏, 田阿利, 张伟. 水下冲击载荷下波纹夹层结构动态响应特性分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(23):90-94,105.
	REN P, TIAN A L, ZHANG W. Dynamic response characteristics of a corrugated core sandwich panel subjected to underwater shock loading[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(23): 90-94,105. (in Chinese)
[12]	姚熊亮, 张阿漫, 许维军, 等. 基于ABAQUS软件的舰船水下爆炸研究[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2006, 27(1):37-41.
	YAO X L, ZHANG A M, XU W J, et al. Research on warship underwater explosion with ABAQUS software[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2006, 27(1): 37-41. (in Chinese)
[13]	HE Z H, CHEN Z H, JIANG Y B, et al. Effects of the standoff distance on hull structure damage subjected to near-field underwater explosion[J]. Marine Structures, 2020, 74: 102839. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102839 URL
[14]	韦辉阳, 荣吉利, 韦振乾, 等. 预置裂纹靶板在水下冲击波作用下的动态响应研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(11): 2250-2258. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.11.009
	WEI H Y, RONG J L, WEI Z Q, et al. Research on dynamic response of pre-cracked target plate subjected to underwater shock wave[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(11): 2250-2258. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.11.009
[15]	魏子涵. 赵振宇. 叶帆, 等. 金属蜂窝夹层结构抗水下爆炸特性[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2021, 41(8): 61-77.
	WEI Z H, ZHAO Z Y, YE F, et al. Underwater explosion shock resistance of all-metallic honeycomb sandwich structures[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2021, 41(8): 61-77. (in Chinese)
[16]	苏标, 姚熊亮, 孙龙泉, 等. 水下接触爆炸作用下双层加筋板架结构的损伤特征[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(增刊1): 127-134.
	SU B, YAO X L, SUN L Q, et al. Damage characteristics of double-layer stiffened shell subjected to underwater contact explosion[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(S1): 127-134. (in Chinese)
[17]	代利辉, 吴成, 安丰江. 水下爆炸载荷下固支方板的动态毁伤模式[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(增刊2): 111-119.
	DAI L H, WU C, AN F J. Research on the dynamic damage of clamped square plates subjected to underwater explosive loading[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(S2): 111-119. (in Chinese)
[18]	CUI X D, ZHAO L MM, WANG Z H, et al. A lattice deformation based model of metallic lattice sandwich plates subjected to impulsive loading[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2012, 49(19/20): 2854-2862. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.04.025 URL
[19]	泮世东, 冯吉才, 吴林志. 金字塔点阵夹芯结构的精细优化设计[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2011, 43(增刊1): 29-33.
	PAN S D, FENG J C, WU L Z. Refined optimal design of sandwich structures with modified pyramidal lattice cores.[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2011, 43(S1): 29-33. (in Chinese)
[20]	XUE B, PENG Y X, REN S F, et al. Investigation of impact resistance performance of pyramid lattice sandwich structure based on SPH-FEM[J]. Composite Structures, 2021, 261: 113561. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113561 URL
[21]	FENG L J, WEI G T, YU G C, et al. Underwater blast behaviors of enhanced lattice truss sandwich panels[J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2019, 150: 238-246. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.10.025 URL

测点	实验值/MPa	仿真值/MPa	误差/%
测点A	62.75	54.91	12.5
测点B	36.29	39.35	8.43

测点	实验值/MPa	仿真值/MPa	误差/%
测点A	62.75	54.91	12.5
测点B	36.29	39.35	8.43

网格尺寸/mm	后面板中心点位移/mm	运算时间/s
0.50	16.15	22 070
0.35	16.58	40 359
0.25	16.76	70 197

网格尺寸/mm	后面板中心点位移/mm	运算时间/s
0.50	16.15	22 070
0.35	16.58	40 359
0.25	16.76	70 197

靶板类型	靶板质量/g	靶板背部中心点位移/mm
金字塔夹芯板	410.5	16.15
实心铝板	410.5	26.86