燃料空气炸药爆轰产物JWL状态方程参数计算

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.10.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 炸药爆轰产物的Jones-Wilkins-Lee(JWL)状态方程参数一般由圆筒试验确定，但圆筒试验并不适用于宏观上呈云雾状态的燃料空气炸药(FAE)。为确定FAE爆轰产物的JWL状态方程参数，基于外场FAE爆轰试验数据，引入反向传播神经网络联合遗传算法(BPNN-GA)，建立适用于FAE的状态方程参数计算方法，并与单爆源和多爆源的外场试验结果对比。研究结果表明：引入BPNN-GA可以简化状态方程参数优化过程，提高了寻优速度和精度；基于FAE爆轰产物JWL状态方程参数，建立单爆源与多爆源的FAE云雾爆轰模型，数值仿真所得的冲击波轮廓与实际爆轰冲击波形貌一致，单爆源与多爆源50 m测点处地面峰值超压仿真值与试验值的最大偏差分别为9.0%和11.1%.

关键词: 燃料空气炸药, Jones-Wilkins-Lee状态方程, 参数确定, 反向传播神经网络联合遗传算法

Abstract: The JWL EOS parameters of detonation products for high explosives are generally determined by the cylinder test. However, the cylinder test is not suitable for fuel air explosives (FAE), which is cloud-like in a macro state. A method for calculating the EOS parameters based on the experimental data of FAE detonation in external field is established to determine the JWL EOS parameters of FAE detonation products. A back propagation neural-based genetic algorithm (BPNN-GA) is introduced into the method. The calculated values are compared with the data from the single- and multi-source external field experiments. The research shows that the introduction of BPNN-GA can simplify the EOS parameter optimization process and also improve the speed and accuracy. Based on the obtained JWL EOS parameters of FAE, the single- and multi-source FAE cloud detonation models are established. The profile of shockwave front from the simulation is consistent with the morphology of actual detonation shockwave. The maximum deviations between simulated and experimental values of the ground peak overpressure at the 50 m measuring points from single- and multi-source are 9.0% and 11.1%, respectively.

Key words: fuel-airexplosive, Jones-Wilkins-Leeequationofstate, parametercalculation, backpropagationneuralnetwork-basedgeneticalgorithm

中图分类号:

O383⁺.1

赵星宇，白春华，姚箭，孙彬峰. 燃料空气炸药爆轰产物JWL状态方程参数计算[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(10): 1921-1929.

ZHAO Xingyu, BAI Chunhua, YAO Jian, SUN Binfeng. Parameters Calculation of JWL EOS of FAE Detonation Products[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(10): 1921-1929.

参考文献

［1］ ZHANG Q, WANG Y X, LIAN Z. Explosion hazards of LPG-air mixtures in vented enclosure with obstacles[J]. Journal of Hazar- dous Materials, 2017, 334: 59-67.
[2］朱小超, 郑立刚, 于水军, 等. 阻塞比对竖直管道中铝粉爆炸特性的影响研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(10): 161-170.
ZHU X C, ZHENG L G, YU S J, et al. Effect of blocking ratio on aluminum powder explosion characteristics in vertical duct[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(10): 161-170. (in Chinese)
[3］ ZHANG F, RIPLEY R C, YOSHINAKA A. Large-scale spray detonation and related particle jetting instability phenomenon[J]. Shock Waves, 2015, 25(3): 239-254.
[4］白春华, 梁慧敏, 李建平, 等. 云雾爆轰[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012: 4-12.
BAI C H, LIANG H M, LI J P, et al. Cloud detonation[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2012: 4-12. (in Chinese)
[5］王晔, 白春华, 李建平. 动态云雾形成及爆轰场特性[J]. 含能材料. 2017, 25(6): 466-471.
WANG Y, BAI C H, LI J P. Formation and blasting field characteristics of moving cloud detonation[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2017, 25(6): 466-471. (in Chinese)
[6］ CHEN J C, MA X, MA Q J. Study on concentration and turbulence of solid-liquid FAE in dispersal process[J]. Defense Technology, 2018, 14(6): 657-660.
[7］陈嘉琛, 张奇, 马秋菊, 等. 固体与液体混合燃料抛撒过程数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(7): 972-976.
CHEN J C, ZHANG Q, MA Q J, et al. Numerical simulation of dispersal process of solid-liquid mixed fuel[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(7): 972-976. (in Chinese)
[8］王廷增, 徐军培, 刘德润, 等. 云雾爆炸场的工程计算[J]. 兵工学报, 1994, 15(3): 94-96.
WANG T Z, XU J P, LIU D R, et al. Engineering calculation for a fuel-air-explosive (FAE) explosion field[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 1994, 15(3): 94-96. (in Chinese)
[9］ BENEDICK W B, TIESZEN S R, KNYSTAUTAS R, et al.Detonation of unconfined large-scale fuel spray-air clouds[M]. Reston, VA, US: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., 1989: 297-310.
[10］ BAI C H, WANG Y, XUE K, et al. Experimental study of detonation of large-scale powder-droplet-vapor mixtures[J]. Shock Waves, 2018, 28(3): 599-611.
[11］ LIU G, HOU F, CAO B, et al. Experimental study of fuel-air explosive[J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 2008, 44(2): 213-217.
[12］ BAI C H, WANG Y, LI J P, et al. Influences of the cloud shape of fuel-air mixtures on the overpressure field[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2016(1): 9748536.
[13］徐胜利, 汤明钧, 糜仲春. 近地空中气云爆炸波遇地面反射的研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 1996, 16(4): 298-304.
XU S L, TANG M J, MI Z C. Studies on reflection of blast waves for symmetric cloud explosion close to the ground[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 1996, 16(4): 298-304. (in Chinese)
[14］王晔, 白春华, 李建平, 等. 非对称云雾爆炸超压场数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(5): 910-916.
WANG Y, BAI C H, LI J P, et al. Simulation of explosion overpressure distribution for non-symmetry cloud detonation[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2017, 38(5): 910-916. (in Chinese)
[15］田园, 王仲琦, 林海燕. 云雾形态对爆轰压力场影响的数值模拟研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2013, 13(4): 182-187.
TIAN Y, WANG Z Q, LIN H Y. Numerical simulation over the impact of the cloud status on the detonation pressure field[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2013, 13(4): 182-187. (in Chinese)
[16］昝文涛, 洪滔, 董贺飞. 铝粉尘云团爆轰温压效应的数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(1): 101-110.
ZAN W T, HONG T, DONG H F. Numerical simulation of detonation temperature and pressure effects of aluminum powder cloud[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(1): 101-110. (in Chinese)
[17］陈明生, 李建平, 白春华. 非圆截面云雾爆炸超压场数值模拟[J]. 含能材料, 2015, 23(5): 484-489.
CHEN M S, LI J P, BAI C H. Simulation of explosion overpressure distribution for non-circular cross-section cloud[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2015, 23(5): 484-489. (in Chinese)
[18］陈明生, 白春华, 李建平. 多点云雾爆炸波相互作用的数值模拟[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2016, 36(1): 81-86.
CHEN M S, BAI C H, LI J P. Simulation of blast waves interaction for multiple cloud explosion[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2016, 36(1): 81-86. (in Chinese)
[19］南宇翔, 蒋建伟, 王树有, 等. 一种与爆轰参数封闭的JWL方程参数确定方法[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2015, 35(2): 157-163.
NAN Y X, JIANG J W, WANG S Y, et al. One parameter-obtained method for JWL equation of state considered detonation parameters[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2015,35(2): 157-163. (in Chinese)
[20］王万军, 孙秀娟, 张雷, 等. 亚微秒内金丝电爆炸的激光探针测试及三维动力学仿真[J]. 含能材料, 2019, 27(6): 473-480.
WANG W J, SUN X J, ZHANG L, et al. Sub-microsecond interferometry diagnostic and 3D dynamic simulation of the bridgewire electrical explosion[J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2019, 27(6): 473-480. (in Chinese)
[21］温丽晶, 段卓平, 张震宇, 等. 采用遗传算法确定炸药爆轰产物JWL状态方程参数[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2013, 33(增刊1): 130-134.
WEN L J, DUAN Z P, ZHANG Z Y, et al. Determination of JWL-EOS parameters for explosive detonation products using genetic algorithm[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2013, 33(S1): 130-134. (in Chinese)
[22］史峰, 王小川, 郁磊, 等. MATLAB神经网络30个案例分析[M]. 北京: 北京航天航空大学出版社, 2010:36-43.
SHI F, WANG X C, YU L, et al. Analysis of 30 cases of MATLAB neural network[M]. Beijing: Beihang University Press, 2010: 36-43. (in Chinese)
[23］司马文霞, 施健, 袁涛, 等. 特高压复合绝缘子电场计算及基于神经网络遗传算法的均压环结构优化设计[J]. 高电压技术, 2012, 38(2): 257-265.
SIMA W X, SHI J, YUAN T, et al. Electric field calculation of ultra-high voltage composite insulator and optimization design of corona ring structure based on neural network and genetic algorithm[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2012, 38(2): 257-265. (in Chinese)
[24］炸药试验方法:GJB 772A—97[S]. 北京:国防科学技术工业委员会, 1997.
Explosive test method:GJB 772A—97[S]. Beijing: Commission of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defence, 1997. (in Chinese)

[1]	贺翔，严楠，曾祥涛，解瑞珍，鲍丙亮，张良，吴伟明. 微尺寸叠氮化铅驱动飞片重要结构参数与飞片速度和能量的关系[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(7): 1363-1371.
[2]	吉童安，娄文忠，付胜华，汪金奎，刘伟桐. 燃料空气炸药二次起爆引信与爆轰云雾动态交会浓度检测方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(11): 2327-2332.
[3]	李瑞, 李伟兵, 靳洪忠, 王桂林, 洪晓文, 朱建军, 李文彬, 王晓鸣. 基于Jones-Wilkins-Lee状态方程的爆轰波相互作用参数理论分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(3): 516-521.
[4]	陈嘉琛，张奇，马秋菊，黄莹，刘雪岭，沈世磊，李栋. 固体与液体混合燃料抛撒过程数值模拟[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(7): 972-976.
[5]	计冬奎，高修柱，肖川，武勇忠，杨凯. 含铝炸药作功能力和JWL状态方程尺寸效应研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2012, 33(5): 552-555.
[6]	刘庆明，白春华. 应用比色测温仪测量燃料空气炸药爆炸过程温度响应[J]. 兵工学报, 2009, 30(4): 425-430.
[7]	闫华，张奇，白春华. 发射过载条件下燃料应カ状态的数值计算[J]. 兵工学报, 2005, 26(5): 609-614.
[8]	张奇，白春华，刘庆明,刘长林. 一次引爆型燃料空气炸药装置结构的实验研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2001, 22(4): 560-562.
[9]	王廷增、徐军培、刘德润、何德昌. 云雾爆炸场的工程计算[J]. 兵工学报, 1994, 15(3): 94-96.