舰艇抗损性的全系统建模及仿真平台研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.03.019

兵工学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 569-576.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.03.019

舰艇抗损性的全系统建模及仿真平台研究

王康勃¹，侯岳¹，浦金云¹，柴卓野²

(1.海军工程大学动力工程学院，湖北武汉430033； 2. 91872部队，北京 102442)

收稿日期:2017-04-08 修回日期:2017-04-08 上线日期:2018-05-07
通讯作者: 侯岳（1982—），男，副教授，博士 E-mail:houyue1982@126.com
作者简介:王康勃（1989—），男，博士研究生。E-mail: wangkangbo1989@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（51409255）

Research on Systemic Modeling and Simulation Platform of Warship Vulnerability

WANG Kang-bo¹， HOU Yue¹， PU Jin-yun¹， CHAI Zhuo-ye²

(1.Power Engineering College，Naval University of Engineering，Wuhan 430033，Hubei，China；2.Unit 91872 of PLA，Beijing 102442，China)

Received:2017-04-08 Revised:2017-04-08 Online:2018-05-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前舰艇抗损性的建模及计算只是针对局部的系统对象，没有考虑任务功能与各类系统设备之间的逻辑关系，缺少交互性强的仿真平台。为实现抗损性评估从系统级到任务级的突破，构建了抗损性的全系统逻辑关系模型和仿真算法，并设计开发了可自定义逻辑关系以及设计方案的交互式仿真平台。应用测试结果表明，该平台可定量分析不同设计方案的抗损性指标，有效指导舰艇抗损性的优化设计工作，是提升舰艇生命力设计水平的一种评估手段。

关键词: 舰艇, 抗损性评估, 全系统建模, 自定义逻辑关系

Abstract: Current vulnerability modeling and calculation are only for partial system and equipment, rather than the logical relationships among mission capability and various warship's systems. An interactive simulation platform is lacking for the simulation of warship vulnerability. For realizing the improvement of vulnerability assessment from system to mission level, the systemic logical modeling and simulation algorithm of warship vulnerability are developed. In addition, an universal simulation platform for user-defined logical relation and design scheme is designed and developed. Application tests indicate that the research result can be used to analyze warship vulnerability for different design schemes, direct warship vulnerability optimization design effectively, and is used for improving warship survivability design. Key

Key words: warship, vulnerabilityassessment, systemicmodeling, self-defininglogicalrelationship

中图分类号:

U674.7⁺02

王康勃，侯岳，浦金云，柴卓野. 舰艇抗损性的全系统建模及仿真平台研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(3): 569-576.

WANG Kang-bo， HOU Yue， PU Jin-yun， CHAI Zhuo-ye. Research on Systemic Modeling and Simulation Platform of Warship Vulnerability[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(3): 569-576.

参考文献

［1］ Said M O. Theory and practice of total ship survivability for ship design［J］. Naval Engineering Journal，1995,107(4)：191-203.
［2］ Reese R M，Calvano C N，Hopkins T M. Operationally oriented vulnerability requirements in the ship design process［J］. Naval Engineering Journal，1998,110(1)：19-34.
［3］ Schofield J. Tri-service survivability assessment SURVIVE and SURVIVE Lite［C］∥European Survivability Workshop. Malvern, Worcestershire, UK: QinetiQ，2008.
［4］ Kotiranta R. The assessment of naval vessel's survivability against explosion in air based on a 3-D product model［D］. Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki University of Technology，2003.
［5］侯岳，浦金云，李彦强，等. 一种舰船蒸汽动力管系损伤隔离及剩余工作制获取方法：中国，CN105205204A［P］. 2015-12-30.
HOU Yue，PU Jin-yun，LI Yan-qiang，et al. An assessment method for warship steam power system damage isolation and residual capability：China，CN105205204A［P］. 2015-12-30.(in Chinese)
［6］ Kim K S，Lee J H. Simplified vulnerability assessment procedure for a warship based on the vulnerable area approach［J］. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology，2012，26(7)：2171-2181.
［7］ Shin Y H，Kwon J I，Chung J H. Development of a simplified vulnerability analysis program for naval vessel［J］. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea，2013，50(6)：383-389.
［8］ Hanthorn D G. Vulnerability analysis of an all-electric warship［D］. Cambridge，MA，US：MIT，2010：14-16.
［9］林华. 舰船电力系统生命力研究［D］. 哈尔滨：哈尔滨工程大学，2012.
LIN Hua. The research for survivability of warship power system［D］. Harbin：Harbin Engineering University，2012.(in Chinese)

［10］王威，闵绍荣，罗威. 基于图论分析法的舰艇作战系统损伤评估研究［J］. 计算机与数字工程，2012，40(2)：32-35.
WANG Wei，MIN Shao-rong，LUO Wei. Damage evaluation of shipboard combat system based on the graph analytical method［J］. Computer & Digital Engineering，2012，40(2)：32-35. (in Chinese)
［11］侯岳，浦金云，孙凯. 一种交互式舰艇不沉性概率评估与设计系统［J］. 海军工程大学学报，2010，22(5)：92-97.
HOU Yue，PU Jin-yun，SUN Kai. On ship unsinkability probability assessment and design system［J］. Journal of Naval University of Engineering，2010，22(5)：92-97. (in Chinese)
［12］ Antao P，Soares C G. Fault-tree models of accident scenarios of RoPax vessels［J］. International Journal of Automation and Computing，2006(2)：107-116.
［13］梁彦刚，陈磊，唐国金. 基于作战对象损伤分析的武器系统效能评估方法［J］. 兵工学报，2008，29(6)：713-717.
LIANG Yan-gang，CHEN Lei，TANG Guo-jin. An approach to assess weapon system effectiveness based on damage analysis of opposed object［J］. Acta Armamentarii，2008，29(6)：713-717. (in Chinese)
［14］ Kim K S，Lee J H. Integrated survivability assessment given multiple penetration hits［J］. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology，2014，28(1):69-76.

第39卷
第3期2018 年3月兵工学报ACTA
ARMAMENTARIIVol.39No.3Mar.2018

[1]	张磊潇，胡伟文，孙慧玲. 舰艇综合防御鱼雷的作战决策及其关联分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(5): 967-974.
[2]	傅冰，曹渊，肖玉杰. 跨平台非制导射弹命中末端火力兼容性判断研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(2): 377-383.
[3]	金家善，蔡芝明，陈砚桥. 舰艇编队不同备件保障方案的对比研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(12): 2356-2365.
[4]	余戌曈，吴玲，卢发兴. 舰艇摇摆下射界动态变化对武器目标分配的影响[J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(9): 1819-1824.
[5]	曾家有，王国卫，钟建林，谢宇鹏. 多平台舰舰导弹饱和攻击几个协同问题与模型[J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(2): 256-261.
[6]	吴晓锋，李旭涌，陈晔. 舰艇作战系统网络的一种分析方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2007, 28(7): 880-884.
[7]	章新华,刘德才,鄂群. 水声对抗中舰艇规避声自导鱼雷的航速问题[J]. 兵工学报, 2002, 23(1): 83-85.

舰艇抗损性的全系统建模及仿真平台研究

Research on Systemic Modeling and Simulation Platform of Warship Vulnerability

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价