基于多影响因子和重要度的故障样本优选

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.12.021

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对测试性试验故障样本选择时影响因子考虑不全面、抽样方法工程应用性不强、影响因子权值主观性较强等问题，提出基于故障模式多影响因子和重要度的故障样本优选方法。在分析基于多影响因子抽样必要性的基础上确定了故障模式影响因子，并提出了基于PageRank的传播强度计算方法；提出了基于信息熵的相似度和基于相对比较关系的支持度计算方法，采用博弈决策方法确定了影响因子权值，实现了基于相对重要度的故障样本优选。将该方法应用于某装备控制系统的测试性验证试验，结果表明：故障样本优选方法能降低单次试验评估结果的随机性；样本选取时综合考虑多种影响因子和既客观又满足试验双方要求的影响因子权值，更符合测试性试验需求，选取的故障样本更合理。

关键词: 故障样本, 影响因子, 重要度, 测试性, 故障传播强度, 相似度, 支持度, 抽样方法

Abstract: A failure sample selection method based on multiple impact factors and importance of failure mode is proposed to solve the problem about the incomplete consideration of impact factors, the insufficient engineering application of sampling method and the strong subjectivity of impact factor weight in failure sample selection of testability test. On the basis of analyzing the necessity of sampling based on multiple influence factors, the impact factors are determined, and a calculation method of propagation intensity based on PageRank is proposed. A calculation method of similarity based on information entropy and support based on relative comparison is proposed, and then the impact factor weights are determined by using the game decision method, and finally the failure sample optimization based on relative importance is realized. The application of the proposed method in a control system shows that this method can be used to reduce the randomness of evaluation results of a single test. In the selection of samples, a variety of impact factors and their weights that are both objective and meet the requirements of test are taken into account comprehensively, which is more in line with the requirements of testability test and makes the selected failure samples more reasonable. Key

Key words: failuresample, impactfactor, importance, testability, failurepropagationintensity, similarity, support, samplingmethod

中图分类号:

TJ06

邱文昊，连光耀，杨金鹏，黄考利. 基于多影响因子和重要度的故障样本优选[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(12): 2551-2559.

QIU Wenhao, LIAN Guangyao, YANG Jinpeng, HUANG Kaoli. Optimal Selection of Failure Samples Based on Multiple Impact Factors and Importance[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(12): 2551-2559.

参考文献

［1］ EVANGELINE C, SIVAMANGAI N M. Evaluation of testability of digital circuits by fault injection technique［C］∥Proceedings of International Conference on Electronics and Communication Systems. Coimbatore, India: IEEE, 2015:92-96.
［2］曾利,汪小林. 测试性试验的FMECA方法研究［J］. 电子产品可靠性与环境试验, 2016, 34(3):54-60.
ZENG L, WANG X L. Research on the FMECA method suitable for testability test［J］. Electronic Product Reliability and Environment Testing, 2016, 34(3):54-60.(in Chinese)
［3］史贤俊,王康,韩旭,等. 基于层次Bayesian网络及后验风险准则的故障样本量确定方法［J］. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(1): 171-181.
SHI X J, WANG K, HAN X, et al. Method for determining fault sample size based on hierarchical Bayesian network and posterior risk criteria［J］. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(1): 171-181. (in Chinese)
［4］田仲, 石君友. 系统测试性设计分析与验证［M］. 北京:北京航空航天大学出版社, 2003:363-384.
TIAN Z, SHI J Y. Analysis and verification of system testability design［M］. Beijing: Beihang University Press, 2003:363-384. (in Chinese)
［5］ United States Department of Defense. Interim notice 2, demonstration and evaluation of equipment/ system build-in test/ attributes and requirements: MIL-STD-471 ［S］. Washington，DC, US：Government Printing Diffice, 1978.
［6］ PLISKA T F, JEW F L, ANGUS J E. BIT/external test figures of merit and demonstration techniques［R］. NY, US: Rome Air Development Center, Griffiss AFB, 1979.
［7］中国航空工业发展研究中心，空军装备研究院航空装备研究所，军械工程学院，等. 装备测试性工作通用要求：GJB 2547A— 2012［S］.北京:总装备部, 2012.
Aviation Industry Development and Research Center of China，Institute of Aeronautical Equipment of Air Force Equipment Research Academy，Ordnance Engineering College，et al. General requirement for material testability program：GJB 2547A—2012［S］. Beijing: General Armament Dapartment, 2012. (in Chinese)
［8］吴栋, 胡泊, 沈峥嵘, 等. 考虑样本充分性和最小样本量的测试性试验方案设计［J］. 电子产品可靠性与环境试验, 2016, 34(4):29-32.
WU D, HU P, SHEN Z R, et al. Testability test scheme design considering sample adequacy and minimum sample size［J］. Electronic Product Reliability and Environment Testing, 2016, 34(4): 29-32. (in Chinese)
［9］韩峰岩, 王红. 基于准随机序列的测试性试验抽样方案［J］. 测控技术, 2015, 34(11):152-156.
HAN F Y, WANG H. A sample plan for testability demonstration based on quasi-random sequence［J］. Measurement & Control Technology, 2015, 34(11): 152-156. (in Chinese)

［10］李天梅, 邱静, 刘冠军. 基于故障率的测试性验证试验故障样本分配方案［J］. 航空学报, 2009, 30(9): 1661-1665.
LI T M, QIU J, LIU G J. Allocation plan of failure samples based on failure rate in testability［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2009, 30(9): 1661-1665. (in Chinese)
［11］ KHAN S, GORRINGE C, FARNSWORTH M. Evaluating diagnostic failure during system design［J］. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2018, 21(1): 97-109.
［12］李天梅, 邱静, 刘冠军, 等. 基于故障扩散强度的故障样本选取方法［J］. 兵工学报, 2008, 29(7): 829-833.
LI T M, QIU J, LIU G J, et al. A method of failure sample selection based on failure pervasion intensity［J］. Acta Armamentarii, 2008, 29(7): 829-833. (in Chinese)
［13］张西山, 黄考利, 敖贤野, 等. 测试性验证试验中的故障样本综合加权分配方法［J］. 计算机测量与控制, 2015， 23(1): 139-142.
ZHANG X S, HUANG K L, AO X Y, et al. Synthetic weighted method of failure samples allocation in testability［J］. Computer Measurement & Control, 2015， 23(1): 139-142. (in Chinese)
［14］陈然, 连光耀, 黄考利, 等. 基于FMECA信息的测试性验证试验样本分配方法［J］. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2017, 43(3): 627-635.
CHEN R, LIAN G Y, HUANG K L, et al. Samples allocation method based on FMECA information for testability verification test［J］. Journal of Beijing University Aeronautics and Asronautics, 2017, 43(3): 627-635. (in Chinese)
［15］ KHORSHIDI H A, GUNAWAN I, IBRAHIM Y. Data-Driven system reliability and failure behavior modeling using FMECA［J］. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2015, 12(3): 1253-1260.
［16］ CERTA A, HOPPS F, INGHILLERI R, et al. A Dempster-Shafer theory-based approach to the Failure Mode, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) under epistemic uncertainly: application to the propulsion system of a fishing vessel［J］. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2017, 159: 69-79.
［17］ XU H B. Reliability analysis of aircraft equipment based on FMECA method［J］. Physics Procedia, 2012, 25(22): 1816-1822.
［18］刘彦, 陈春良, 昝翔, 等. 考虑双层耦合复杂网络的装备重要度评估方法［J］. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(9): 1829-1840.
LIU Y, CHEN C L, ZAN X, et al. Evaluation method for equipment importance considering Bi-layer coupled complex network［J］. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(9): 1829-1840. (in Chinese)
［19］ WANG Y H, SHI H, JIA L M, et al. Multi paths fault propagation model for network modeled system［C］∥Proceedings of the World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation. Shenyang, China：IEEE, 2014：5915-5920.
［20］ GONG C, FU K R, LOZA A, et al. PageRank tracker: from ranking to tracking［J］. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2014, 44(6): 882-893.
［21］李兰英, 周秋丽, 孔银. 子图估算PageRank网页排序算法研究［J］. 哈尔滨理工大学学报, 2017, 22(2): 117-123.
LI L Y, ZHOU Q L, KONG Y. Research of subgraph estimation PageRank algorithm for web page rank［J］. Journal of Harbin University of Science and Technology, 2017, 22(2): 117-123. (in Chinese)
［22］王京, 李天梅, 何华锋, 等. 多源测试性综合评估数据等效折合模型与方法研究［J］. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(1): 151-159.
WANG J, LI T M, HE H F, et al. Research on multi-source data equivalent methods for testability integrated evaluation［J］. Acta Armamentarii, 2017, 38(1): 151-159. (in Chinese)
［23］张秦, 方志耕, 蔡佳佳, 等. 基于广义灰色激励因子的多源不确定性指标动态综合评价模型研究［J］. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(3): 586-593.
ZHANG Q, FANG Z G, CAI J J, et al. Research on the dynamic comprehensive evaluation model of multi-source uncertain indexes based on the generalized grey incentive factors［J］. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(3): 586-593. (in Chinese)
［24］ LAARHOVEN P J M V, PEDRYCZ W. A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory［J］. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1983, 11(1/2/3): 229-241.
［25］唐忠, 李文强, 李彦. 含广义三角模糊数的机械结构可靠度计算方法［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(8): 2155-2167.
TANG Z, LI W Q, LI Y. Reliability calculation method for mechanical structures with generalized triangular fuzzy number［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2018, 38(8): 2155-2167. (in Chinese)
［26］ NOWAK M A, MAY R M. Evolutionary games and spatial chaos［J］. Nature, 1992, 359(6398): 826-829.
［27］ BHATTARAI A, KOMOLKITI P, ASWAKUL C. Improved bandwidth allocation in cognitive radio networks based on game theory［C］∥Proceedings of Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology. Krabi, Thailand：IEEE, 2013: 15-17.
［28］徐保荣, 刘学工, 吴延威, 等. 基于试验结果可信度的装甲车辆测试性综合评估方法研究［J］. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(6): 1066-1073.
XU B R, LIU X G, WU Y W, et al. Research on comprehensive evaluation method for testability［J］. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(6): 1066-1073. (in Chinese)

第40卷
第12期2019 年12月兵工学报ACTA
ARMAMENTARIIVol.40No.12Dec.2019

[1]	刘琳，龚晨，李朦朦，王然. 基于虚拟现实技术的可靠性、测试性、维修性、安全性、保障性设计[J]. 兵工学报, 2022, 43(S1): 208-213.
[2]	翟禹尧，史贤俊，韩露，吕佳朋. 基于广义随机有色Petri网的测试性建模方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(3): 655-662.
[3]	王超，郭基联，符凌云. 基于拓扑势的作战体系网络节点重要度评估方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(8): 1658-1664.
[4]	孙亚平，李宗吉，张宁，孙强，孙玉臣，汤建林. 基于广义随机Petri网的鱼雷系统级测试性参数确定方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(11): 2274-2280.
[5]	周泉，姚敏立，沈晓卫. 基于支持度的椭球拟合微机械电子系统加速度计现场标定方法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(1): 68-74.
[6]	翟禹尧，史贤俊，秦玉峰，吕佳朋. 基于层次广义随机Petri网的测试性建模新方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(1): 161-170.
[7]	王康，史贤俊，秦亮，聂新华，龙玉峰. 基于Bayes小子样理论和序贯网图检验的武器装备测试性验证试验方案设计[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(11): 2319-2328.
[8]	翟禹尧，史贤俊，吕佳朋. 基于广义随机Petri网的导弹系统测试性建模与指标评估方法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(10): 2070-2079.
[9]	史贤俊，王康，韩旭，龙玉峰. 基于层次Bayesian网络及后验风险准则的故障样本量确定方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(1): 171-181.
[10]	刘彦，陈春良，昝翔，陈伟龙. 考虑双层耦合复杂网络的装备重要度评估方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(9): 1829-1840.
[11]	徐保荣，刘学工，吴延威，胡伟锋. 基于试验结果可信度的装甲车辆测试性综合评估方法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(6): 1066-1073.
[12]	李泽，闫晓鹏，栗苹，郝新红，王建涛. 基于相似度的无线电引信抗干扰能力量化表征方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(7): 1282-1288.
[13]	陈春良，昝翔，张仕新，曹艳华，陈伟龙. 基于多维关系复杂网络的装备重要度评估方法[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(6): 1168-1177.
[14]	李志强，徐廷学，顾钧元，安进，董琪. 视情维修条件下的多状态控制单元可用性建模与分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(11): 2240-2250.
[15]	赵抢抢，侯保林. 火炮弹药协调器区间不确定参数辨识[J]. 兵工学报, 2017, 38(1): 35-42.